Pearson Phillip P, Li Cheng X, Chappell Tyson D, Waters Robert S
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, 855 Monroe Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Nov;153(1):100-12. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1625-z. Epub 2003 Aug 29.
We previously reported that 6-16 weeks after forelimb amputation in adult rats, neurons in layer IV of rat first somatosensory cortex (SI) in the forepaw barrel subfield (FBS) associated with the representation of the forepaw became responsive to new input from the shoulder (Pearson et al. 1999). These new shoulder-responsive sites in deafferented FBS had longer evoked response latencies than did sites in the shoulder representation located in the posterior part of the trunk subfield, hereafter referred to as the original shoulder representation. Furthermore, projection neurons in the original shoulder representation in both intact and deafferented adults did not extend their axons into the FBS, and ablation of the original shoulder representation cortex and/or the second somatosensory cortex (SII) failed to eliminate new shoulder input in the deafferented FBS (Pearson et al. 2001). These results led us to conclude that large-scale reorganization in FBS quite likely involved a subcortical substrate. In addition, the time course for large-scale cortical reorganization following forelimb amputation was unknown, and this information could shed light on potential mechanisms for large-scale cortical reorganization. In the present study, we extended our previous findings of large-scale cortical reorganization in the FBS by investigating the time course for reorganization following forelimb amputation. The major findings are: a) deafferented forelimb cortex remained unresponsive to shoulder stimulation during the 1st week following forelimb amputation; b) new responses to shoulder stimulation were first observed in deafferented forelimb cortex 2-3 weeks after forelimb amputation; however, the new shoulder input was restricted to locations in the former forearm cortex; c) islet(s) of new shoulder representation were first observed in deafferented FBS 4 weeks after amputation; these islets occupied a larger percentage of FBS in subsequent weeks; d) portions of FBS remained unresponsive as many as 4 months after deafferentation (maximum time examined between amputation and recording); and e) the increase in total size of the shoulder representation appeared to result from the establishment of new shoulder representations that were often discontinuous from the original shoulder representation. These findings provide evidence that forelimb amputation results in delayed reorganization of the FBS and we describe possible mechanisms and substrates underlying the reorganization.
我们之前报道过,成年大鼠前肢截肢后6 - 16周,前爪桶状亚区(FBS)中大鼠第一躯体感觉皮层(SI)第IV层中与前爪代表区相关的神经元开始对来自肩部的新输入产生反应(Pearson等人,1999年)。去传入神经的FBS中这些新的肩部反应位点的诱发反应潜伏期比位于躯干亚区后部的肩部代表区(以下称为原始肩部代表区)中的位点更长。此外,完整和去传入神经的成年大鼠原始肩部代表区中的投射神经元并未将其轴突延伸至FBS,并且切除原始肩部代表皮层和/或第二躯体感觉皮层(SII)未能消除去传入神经的FBS中的新肩部输入(Pearson等人,2001年)。这些结果使我们得出结论,FBS中的大规模重组很可能涉及一个皮层下基质。此外,前肢截肢后大规模皮层重组的时间进程尚不清楚,而这些信息可能有助于揭示大规模皮层重组的潜在机制。在本研究中,我们通过研究前肢截肢后重组的时间进程,扩展了我们之前关于FBS中大规模皮层重组的发现。主要发现如下:a)在前肢截肢后的第1周,去传入神经的前肢皮层对肩部刺激仍无反应;b)在前肢截肢后2 - 3周,首次在去传入神经的前肢皮层中观察到对肩部刺激的新反应;然而,新的肩部输入仅限于以前的前臂皮层区域;c)截肢后4周,首次在去传入神经的FBS中观察到新的肩部代表岛;在随后的几周中,这些岛占据FBS的比例更大;d)去传入神经后长达4个月(截肢与记录之间检查的最长时间),FBS的部分区域仍无反应;e)肩部代表区总面积的增加似乎是由于新的肩部代表区的建立,这些新代表区通常与原始肩部代表区不连续。这些发现提供了证据,表明前肢截肢导致FBS的重组延迟,并且我们描述了重组背后可能的机制和基质。