Pelosi Giuseppe, Fraggetta Filippo, Nappi Oscar, Pastorino Ugo, Maisonneuve Patrick, Pasini Felice, Iannucci Antonio, Solli Piergiorgio, Musavinasab Hossein S, De Manzoni Giovanni, Terzi Alberto, Viale Giuseppe
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute of European Oncology and University of Milan School of Medicine, Italy.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2003 Sep;27(9):1203-15. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200309000-00003.
We investigated 31 cases of pleomorphic carcinomas of the lung, with a double component of neoplastic epithelial cells and of spindle and/or giant cells. To correlate the morphologic diversity of these two cell components with their immunophenotype, we evaluated the expression of several gene products involved in cell differentiation (cytokeratins, epithelial membrane antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, vimentin, S-100 protein, smooth muscle actin, desmin), cell cycle control and apoptosis (p53, p21Waf1, p27Kip1, FHIT), tumor growth (proliferative fraction, assessed by Ki-67 antigen, and microvascular density, assessed by CD34 immunostaining), and tumor cell motility (fascin). We found the epithelial component to be significantly more immunoreactive for cytokeratins, epithelial membrane antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, cell cycle inhibitors p21Waf1, p27Kip1 and tumor suppressor gene FHIT, whereas the sarcomatoid component, independent of tumor stage and size, was more immunoreactive for vimentin, fascin, and microvascular density. Accordingly, we suggest a model of tumorigenesis whereby the mesenchymal phenotype of pleomorphic cells is likely induced by the selective activation and segregation of several molecules involved in cell differentiation, cell cycle control, and tumor cell growth and motility. Whether pleomorphic carcinomas of the lung are tumors with a dismal prognosis still remains an unsettled issue. In our series, however, stage I pleomorphic carcinomas have the same clinical behavior as ordinary non-small cell lung cancer, and only a high proliferative index (Ki-67 labeling index >35%) is associated with a worse prognosis in these tumors.
我们研究了31例肺多形性癌,其具有肿瘤上皮细胞以及梭形和/或巨细胞的双重成分。为了将这两种细胞成分的形态学多样性与其免疫表型相关联,我们评估了几种参与细胞分化的基因产物(细胞角蛋白、上皮膜抗原、癌胚抗原、波形蛋白、S-100蛋白、平滑肌肌动蛋白、结蛋白)、细胞周期调控和凋亡(p53、p21Waf1、p27Kip1、FHIT)、肿瘤生长(通过Ki-67抗原评估的增殖分数以及通过CD34免疫染色评估的微血管密度)以及肿瘤细胞运动性(成束蛋白)的表达。我们发现上皮成分对细胞角蛋白、上皮膜抗原、癌胚抗原、细胞周期抑制剂p21Waf1、p27Kip1和肿瘤抑制基因FHIT的免疫反应性明显更强,而肉瘤样成分,无论肿瘤分期和大小如何,对波形蛋白、成束蛋白和微血管密度的免疫反应性更强。因此,我们提出了一种肿瘤发生模型,即多形性细胞的间充质表型可能由参与细胞分化、细胞周期调控以及肿瘤细胞生长和运动性的几种分子的选择性激活和分离所诱导。肺多形性癌是否是预后不良的肿瘤仍然是一个未解决的问题。然而,在我们的系列研究中,I期多形性癌具有与普通非小细胞肺癌相同的临床行为,并且只有高增殖指数(Ki-