Saviotti M, Regalia F, Piane C
Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale S. Carlo Borromeo, Milano.
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1992 Dec;40(12):501-4.
The records of the Catheter Laboratory at S. Carlo Hospital in Milan (a District General Hospital without Cardiac Surgery Unit) between 1989-1991 were reviewed to determine how often emergency coronary by-pass surgery was performed because of a complication arising during elective coronary arteriography. A total of 1,009 cardiac procedures were performed, 876 (87%) were confined to left ventricular angiography and coronary arteriography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Our Catheter Laboratory complications rate was low: death 0.1%, stroke 0, non fatal myocardial infarction 0.8%, arrhythmia 0.5%, femoral haematoma 0.7%, emergency cardiac surgery 0. Case selection, seniority of operators, femoral approach (98% of the cases) with coronary catheters 6 French can explain these good results. In our experience coronary angiography at a District General Hospital is safe, feasible and diagnostic. Besides our main problem is the non emergency access to a Cardiac Surgery Unit after coronary arteriography: our patients have to join a long waiting list at major Regional Centres with an increase in cardiac events.
回顾了米兰圣卡罗医院(一家没有心脏外科的区级综合医院)导管实验室1989年至1991年期间的记录,以确定因择期冠状动脉造影术中出现并发症而进行急诊冠状动脉搭桥手术的频率。共进行了1009例心脏手术,其中876例(87%)仅限于对疑似冠状动脉疾病患者进行左心室造影和冠状动脉造影。我们导管实验室的并发症发生率较低:死亡率0.1%,中风0例,非致命性心肌梗死0.8%,心律失常0.5%,股部血肿0.7%,急诊心脏手术0例。病例选择、操作人员资历、采用股动脉入路(98%的病例)以及使用6F冠状动脉导管可以解释这些良好结果。根据我们的经验,区级综合医院进行冠状动脉造影是安全、可行且具有诊断价值的。此外,我们的主要问题是冠状动脉造影术后无法非急诊接入心脏外科:我们的患者必须在主要区域中心加入长长的等候名单,这会增加心脏事件的发生。