Understanding research: 2. Ensuring reliability and validity.
作者信息
Baxter H
机构信息
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK.
出版信息
J Wound Care. 2001 Sep;10(8):329-31. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2001.10.8.26116.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Understanding research: 2. Ensuring reliability and validity.理解研究：2. 确保可靠性和有效性。
J Wound Care. 2001 Sep;10(8):329-31. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2001.10.8.26116.
2
Reliability and validity in research.研究中的信度与效度。
Nurs Stand. 2006;20(44):41-5. doi: 10.7748/ns2006.07.20.44.41.c6560.
3
Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability.认识我们方法中的错误：绘制效度和信度的概念图。
Nurs Outlook. 2006 Jan-Feb;54(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.12.004.
4
Understanding research: 3. Critiquing findings and conclusions.理解研究：3. 评判研究结果与结论。
J Wound Care. 2001 Oct;10(9):376-9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2001.10.9.26118.
5
Randomization by cluster.整群随机分组
Nurs Res. 1991 Nov-Dec;40(6):356-8.
6
Research considerations: power analysis and effect size.研究考量：功效分析与效应量
Medsurg Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(1):41-2.
7
Are we satisfied with the way we review an article?我们对审核文章的方式感到满意吗？
Adv Neonatal Care. 2009 Feb;9(1):40-2. doi: 10.1097/01.ANC.0000346095.35734.fb.
8
Validity and reliability in qualitative research.定性研究中的效度与信度。
Curationis. 1993 Jun;16(2):35-8. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v16i2.1396.
9
The importance of pilot studies.试点研究的重要性。
Nurs Stand. 2002;16(40):33-6. doi: 10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214.
10
Validity: a concept at the heart of research.效度：研究核心的一个概念。
Br J Nurs. 1995;4(9):530-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1995.4.9.530.
引用本文的文献
1
Pain after spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for clinical practice and research. Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures meeting.脊髓损伤后的疼痛：基于证据的临床实践与研究综述。美国国家残疾与康复研究所脊髓损伤测量会议报告。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(5):421-40. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2007.11753405.
Zotero 插件