Hoogewoud H M, Neiss A C, Woessmer B
Département de Radiologie, Hôpital Cantonal, Fribourg, Suisse.
Ann Radiol (Paris). 1992;35(4 Pt 2):273-5.
The authors compared ioversol 300 and iopromide 300 (ioversol 41 patients, iopromide 38 patients) in a randomized double blind study conducted on 79 patients undergoing abdominal computed tomography (CT) for a variety of indications. Each study was rated as diagnostic or non-diagnostic and the image quality was recorded. All side-effects were recorded. There was no significant difference in image quality and side-effects between both contrasts. In this study, both ioversol and iopromide provided excellent image quality and a low rate of side-effects. The authors conclude that ioversol is a safe and effective non ionic contrast agent for contrast enhanced body CT.
作者在一项针对79例因各种适应症接受腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)的患者进行的随机双盲研究中,比较了碘海醇300和碘普罗胺300(碘海醇组41例患者,碘普罗胺组38例患者)。每项研究被评定为诊断性或非诊断性,并记录图像质量。记录所有副作用。两种对比剂在图像质量和副作用方面均无显著差异。在本研究中,碘海醇和碘普罗胺均提供了优异的图像质量和低副作用发生率。作者得出结论,碘海醇是一种用于增强体部CT的安全有效的非离子型对比剂。