Kraaijeveld Ken
Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1785-91. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2450.
Many bird species have ornaments that are expressed equally in both sexes. I use comparative analysis to investigate why some monomorphic birds are highly ornamented, whereas others are drab. The results show a significant positive association between the degree of mutual ornamentation and divorce rate. This result is robust to the removal of the effects of phylogeny, site fidelity, residency, coloniality, nest type, mortality, body size and body-size dimorphism. The level of extra-pair paternity was not related to the degree of mutual ornamentation. I argue that these results are compatible with a process of mutual sexual selection, in which both sexes compete for access to mates. The coupled evolution of ornamentation and divorce rate, from the probable ancestral state of a high degree of ornamentation and a low divorce rate, appears to result mainly from a loss of ornamentation under mate fidelity.
许多鸟类物种都有在两性中表现相同的装饰物。我运用比较分析来探究为什么一些单态性鸟类拥有高度装饰性,而其他鸟类却色彩单调。结果显示,相互装饰的程度与离婚率之间存在显著的正相关。去除系统发育、留巢忠诚度、居留性、集群性、巢类型、死亡率、体型及体型两性差异的影响后,这一结果依然稳健。婚外父权水平与相互装饰的程度无关。我认为这些结果与相互性选择过程相符,即两性都为获得配偶而竞争。从装饰性高且离婚率低的可能祖先状态来看,装饰性与离婚率的协同进化似乎主要源于配偶忠诚下装饰性的丧失。