• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[千年之末——单支乳内动脉移植的终结?双支乳内动脉——下个千年的标准?1487例双侧乳内动脉搭桥患者的早期临床结果及危险因素分析]

[End of the millennium - end of the single mammary artery graft? Two internal mammary arteries - standard for the next millennium? Early clinical results and analysis of risk factors in 1487 patients with bilateral internal mammary artery bypass].

作者信息

Gansera B, Angelis I, Botzenhardt F, Günzinger R, Neumaier-Prauser P, Kemkes B M

机构信息

Krankenhaus München-Bogenhausen Abteilung für Kardiovaskularchirurgie Englschalkinger Str. 77 81925 München, Germany.

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 2003 May;92(5):398-406. doi: 10.1007/s00392-003-0926-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00392-003-0926-3
PMID:12966832
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

CABG with bilateral IMA grafts (BIMA) can improve long-term results in cardiac morbidity and mortality. An enhanced incidence of bleeding and wound complications compared to patients with single IMA (SIMA) remains a matter of debate. The aim of the study was to compare the operative outcomes of patients who had undergone CABG with BIMA and SIMA in situ grafts, especially to identify patient-related risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus and age above 70 years.

METHODS

Out of a total of 5144 patients operated on between January 1996 and September 1999, patients with isolated CABG (n = 3671) with BIMA or SIMA were analyzed retrospectively. In the BIMA group, the patients' (n = 1478) mean age was 64.0 years; mean EF was 62.1%. In the SIMA group (n = 2184), mean age was 65.4 years and mean EF was 60.6% (n.s.). In the BIMA group, the right IMA was led anterior of the aorta to the LAD, the left IMA to the lateral wall. In the SIMA group, the LAD was revascularized with the left IMA. Additional bypasses were performed with vein grafts.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality was 1.6% in the BIMA group, 1.7% in the SIMA group in patients under 70 years, and 4.1% (BIMA) and 4.0% (SIMA) in patients over 70 years (p = n.s.). A significantly higher blood loss was observed in the BIMA group (BIMA 979 +/- 708 ml; SIMA 790 +/- 575 ml; p < 0.05). The rethoracotomy rate due to bleeding was significantly higher in patients with BIMA (4.1%) compared to those with SIMA (2.5%; p < 0.05). In patients with a body mass index (BMI) of less than 27, no significant difference could be found (SIMA 2.8%, BIMA 3.4%; p = n.s.). Patients with a BMI > 27 showed a significantly higher rethoractomy rate (SIMA 2.2%; BIMA 4.9%). A higher incidence of sternal instabilities could be observed in the BIMA group (4.2%; p < 0.05). Diabetes mellitus could not be identified as an independent risk factor for sternal complications (SIMA 2.9%; BIMA 5.0%; p = n.s.).

CONCLUSION

CABG using both IMAs can be performed in nearly all patients as a routine method with good clinical results and low mortality. Bleeding in the BIMA group within 48 h was increased. BMI > 27 could be identified as a risk factor for sternal complications, but not diabetes mellitus or age over 70 years.

摘要

目的

双侧胸廓内动脉(BIMA)移植的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)可改善心脏疾病发病率和死亡率的长期结果。与单根胸廓内动脉(SIMA)移植的患者相比,出血和伤口并发症发生率增加仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较接受BIMA原位移植和SIMA原位移植的CABG患者的手术结果,特别是确定与患者相关的危险因素,如肥胖、糖尿病和70岁以上年龄。

方法

在1996年1月至1999年9月期间接受手术的5144例患者中,对接受单纯CABG(n = 3671)且采用BIMA或SIMA的患者进行回顾性分析。在BIMA组中,患者(n = 1478)的平均年龄为64.0岁;平均射血分数(EF)为62.1%。在SIMA组(n = 2184)中,平均年龄为65.4岁,平均EF为60.6%(无显著差异)。在BIMA组中,右侧胸廓内动脉经主动脉前方引至左前降支(LAD),左侧胸廓内动脉引至侧壁。在SIMA组中,LAD由左侧胸廓内动脉进行血运重建。其他旁路采用静脉移植。

结果

70岁以下患者中,BIMA组30天死亡率为1.6%,SIMA组为1.7%;70岁以上患者中,BIMA组为4.1%,SIMA组为4.0%(p = 无显著差异)。BIMA组观察到显著更高的失血量(BIMA 979 ± 708 ml;SIMA 790 ± 575 ml;p < 0.05)。与SIMA患者(2.5%)相比,BIMA患者因出血导致的再次开胸率显著更高(4.1%;p < 0.05)。体重指数(BMI)小于27的患者中,未发现显著差异(SIMA 2.8%,BIMA 3.4%;p = 无显著差异)。BMI > 27的患者再次开胸率显著更高(SIMA 2.2%;BIMA 4.9%)。在BIMA组中可观察到更高的胸骨不稳定发生率(4.2%;p < 0.05)。糖尿病未被确定为胸骨并发症的独立危险因素(SIMA 2.9%;BIMA 5.0%;p = 无显著差异)。

结论

几乎所有患者均可将使用双侧胸廓内动脉的CABG作为常规方法进行,临床效果良好且死亡率低。BIMA组48小时内出血增加。BMI > 27可被确定为胸骨并发症的危险因素,但糖尿病或70岁以上年龄不是。

相似文献

1
[End of the millennium - end of the single mammary artery graft? Two internal mammary arteries - standard for the next millennium? Early clinical results and analysis of risk factors in 1487 patients with bilateral internal mammary artery bypass].[千年之末——单支乳内动脉移植的终结?双支乳内动脉——下个千年的标准?1487例双侧乳内动脉搭桥患者的早期临床结果及危险因素分析]
Z Kardiol. 2003 May;92(5):398-406. doi: 10.1007/s00392-003-0926-3.
2
End of the millenium--end of the single thoracic artery graft? Two thoracic arteries--standard for the next millenium? Early clinical results and analysis of risk factors in 1,487 patients with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts.千年之末——单支胸廓内动脉移植术的终结?两支胸廓内动脉——下一个千年的标准?1487例行双侧胸廓内动脉移植术患者的早期临床结果及危险因素分析。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Feb;49(1):10-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-9923.
3
Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts.杂交冠状动脉血运重建术与双侧或单根内乳动脉旁路移植术治疗冠心病的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):1081-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.061. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
4
Propensity-matched analysis of bilateral internal mammary artery vs single internal mammary artery in 7702 cases of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.7702 例单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术中双侧内乳动脉与单支内乳动脉的倾向性匹配分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Oct;44(4):711-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt157. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
5
Coronary Revascularization With Single Versus Bilateral Mammary Arteries: Is It Time to Change?单支与双侧乳内动脉冠状动脉血运重建:是时候改变了吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):466-472. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.089. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
6
Survival after bilateral internal mammary artery in coronary artery bypass grafting: Are women at risk?冠状动脉旁路移植术后双侧内乳动脉的存活:女性有风险吗?
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;270:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.028.
7
Bilateral mammary artery grafting increases postoperative mediastinitis without survival benefit in obese patients.双侧乳内动脉移植术会增加肥胖患者术后纵隔炎的发生率,且对生存率无益处。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Dec;50(6):1188-1195. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw164. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Artery Use in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Matched Analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术中双侧与单侧乳内动脉的应用:一项倾向匹配分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 May;28(5):807-813. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
9
Efficacy of single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in women: a long-term study.女性单侧与双侧乳内动脉移植的疗效:一项长期研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Jun;71(6):1949-57; discussion 1957-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02592-9.
10
Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting reverses the negative influence of gender on outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.双侧内乳动脉搭桥术可逆转性别对冠状动脉旁路移植术结果的负面影响。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;44(1):54-63. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs683. Epub 2013 Feb 6.