Kjorstad Mari C
Creighton University.
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2003 Summer;27(1):34-42. doi: 10.2975/27.2003.34.42.
Health insurance plans typically provide less coverage for mental health and chemical dependency treatment than for general medical services. In 1996 the federal government responded to these inequities by passing the Mental Health Parity Act, requiring equal annual lifetime dollar limits for mental health benefits. However, provisions within the law are easily circumvented, rendering it relatively ineffective as implemented. The Senator Paul Wellstone Mental Health Equitable Treatment Act of 2003 measures (S. 486 & H.R. 953) currently in Congress would expand the language and effectiveness of the Mental Health Parity Act. This paper reviews the limitations of both the 1996 federal law and existing state laws, and explains why federal action to expand the Mental Health Parity Act is so critical to people with mental illnesses.
与一般医疗服务相比,医疗保险计划通常为心理健康和药物依赖治疗提供的覆盖范围更少。1996年,联邦政府通过了《心理健康平权法案》来应对这些不平等现象,要求对心理健康福利设定同等的年度终身美元限额。然而,该法律中的条款很容易被规避,导致其在实施过程中相对无效。目前国会正在审议的2003年保罗·韦尔斯通参议员《心理健康公平治疗法案》措施(参议院第486号法案和众议院第953号法案)将扩大《心理健康平权法案》的适用范围并提高其效力。本文回顾了1996年联邦法律和现有州法律的局限性,并解释了为什么联邦政府扩大《心理健康平权法案》的行动对患有精神疾病的人如此重要。