Suppr超能文献

使用上身毯子的强制空气加热系统之间的差异很小。一项针对志愿者热传递的随机试验。

Differences among forced-air warming systems with upper body blankets are small. A randomized trial for heat transfer in volunteers.

作者信息

Perl T, Bräuer A, Timmermann A, Mielck F, Weyland W, Braun U

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Oct;47(9):1159-64. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00222.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Forced-air warming is known as an effective procedure in prevention and treatment of perioperative hypothermia. Significant differences have been described between forced-air warming systems in combination with full body blankets. We investigated four forced-air warming systems in combination with upper body blankets for existing differences in heat transfer.

METHODS

After approval of the local Ethics Committee and written informed consent, four forced-air warming systems combined with upper body blankets were investigated in a randomized cross-over trial on six healthy volunteers: (1) BairHugger trade mark 505 and Upper Body Blanket 520, Augustine Medical; (2) ThermaCare trade mark TC 3003, Gaymar trade mark and Optisan trade mark Upper Body Blanket, Brinkhaus; (3) WarmAir trade mark 134 and FilteredFlow trade mark Upper Body Blanket, CSZ; and (4) WarmTouch trade mark 5800 and CareDrape trade mark Upper Body Blanket, Mallinckrodt. Heat transfer from the blanket to the body surface was measured with 11 calibrated heat flux transducers (HFTs) with integrated thermistors on the upper body. Additionally, the blanket temperature was measured 1 cm above the HFT. After a preparation time of 60 min measurements were started for 20 min. Mean values were calculated over 20 min. The t-test for matched pairs with Bonferroni-Holm-correcture for multiple testing was used for statistical evaluation at a P-level of 0.05. The values are presented as mean+/-SD.

RESULTS

The WarmTouch trade mark blower with the CareDrape trade mark blanket obtained the best heat flux (17.0+/-3.5 W). The BairHugger trade mark system gave the lowest heat transfer (8.1+/-1.1 W). The heat transfer of the ThermaCare trade mark system and WarmAir trade mark systems were intermediate with 14.3+/-2.1 W and 11.3+/-1.0 W.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on an estimated heat loss from the covered area of 38 W the heat balance is changed by 46.1 W to 55 W by forced-air warming systems with upper body blankets. Although the differences in heat transfer are significant, the clinical relevance of this difference is small.

摘要

背景

强制空气加温被认为是预防和治疗围手术期低体温的有效方法。已报道强制空气加温系统与全身毯联合使用时存在显著差异。我们研究了四种强制空气加温系统与上身毯联合使用时在热传递方面的现有差异。

方法

经当地伦理委员会批准并获得书面知情同意后,在六名健康志愿者身上进行了一项随机交叉试验,研究了四种强制空气加温系统与上身毯的联合使用情况:(1)奥古斯汀医疗公司的BairHugger商标505和上身毯520;(2)布林克豪斯公司的ThermaCare商标TC 3003、盖马尔商标和Optisan商标上身毯;(3)CSZ公司的WarmAir商标134和FilteredFlow商标上身毯;(4)马林克罗德特公司的WarmTouch商标5800和CareDrape商标上身毯。使用11个带有集成热敏电阻的校准热通量传感器(HFT)在上半身测量从毯子到身体表面的热传递。此外,在HFT上方1厘米处测量毯子温度。经过60分钟的准备时间后,开始测量20分钟。计算20分钟内的平均值。采用配对t检验,并使用Bonferroni-Holm校正进行多重检验,以P值0.05进行统计评估。数值以平均值±标准差表示。

结果

带有CareDrape商标毯子的WarmTouch商标吹风机获得了最佳热通量(17.0±3.5瓦)。BairHugger商标系统的热传递最低(8.1±1.1瓦)。ThermaCare商标系统和WarmAir商标系统的热传递处于中间水平,分别为14.3±2.1瓦和11.3±1.0瓦。

结论

根据覆盖面积估计的热损失为38瓦,使用上身毯的强制空气加温系统可使热平衡改变46.1瓦至55瓦。尽管热传递的差异显著,但这种差异的临床相关性较小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验