• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远距分析：整合来自不同类型研究的数据。

Teleoanalysis: combining data from different types of study.

作者信息

Wald Nicholas J, Morris Joan K

机构信息

Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and the London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of London, London EC1M 6BQ.

出版信息

BMJ. 2003 Sep 13;327(7415):616-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7415.616.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.327.7415.616
PMID:12969936
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC194099/
Abstract

Teleoanalysis can provide the answer to questions that would be obtained from studies that have not been done and often, for ethical and financial reasons, could never be done

摘要

远距分析可以为那些从尚未开展且往往因伦理和财务原因永远无法开展的研究中获得的问题提供答案。

相似文献

1
Teleoanalysis: combining data from different types of study.远距分析：整合来自不同类型研究的数据。
BMJ. 2003 Sep 13;327(7415):616-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7415.616.
2
Theoretical and methodological differentiation of moderation and mediation.调节作用与中介作用的理论及方法学区分
Nurs Res. 1993 Sep-Oct;42(5):276-9.
3
[An introduction to causality principles in biomedical research].[生物医学研究中的因果关系原理介绍]
Gesundheitswesen. 2014 Dec;76(12):874-82; quiz 883-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387509. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
4
Remarks on the method of propensity score.关于倾向评分法的评论
Stat Med. 2009 Apr 30;28(9):1415-6; author reply 1420-3. doi: 10.1002/sim.3521.
5
Causal Modeling in WOC Nursing Research.伤口、造口及失禁护理研究中的因果模型
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2003 Jul;30(4):168-74. doi: 10.1067/mjw.2003.130.
6
Causal or casual? The role of causality assessment in pharmacovigilance.因果关系还是偶然关系？因果关系评估在药物警戒中的作用。
Drug Saf. 1997 Dec;17(6):374-89. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199717060-00004.
7
Epilogue.后记
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):214. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
8
[Interpretation of an epidemiolog survey. Survey types, concepts of bias, causality].[一项流行病学调查的解读。调查类型、偏倚概念、因果关系]
Rev Prat. 1992 Nov 15;42(18):2377-82.
9
[Interpretation of an epidemiological survey. Survey types, concepts of bias, causality].
Rev Prat. 1996 Apr 15;46(8):997-1003.
10
Analysing and interpreting competing risk data.分析和解读竞争风险数据。
Stat Med. 2007 Mar 15;26(6):1360-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.2655.

引用本文的文献

1
Folic acid and neural tube defects: Discovery, debate and the need for policy change.叶酸与神经管缺陷：发现、争议与政策变革的需要。
J Med Screen. 2022 Sep;29(3):138-146. doi: 10.1177/09691413221102321. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
2
How should we evaluate research on counselling and the treatment of depression? A case study on how the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's draft 2018 guideline for depression considered what counts as best evidence.我们应如何评估关于抑郁症咨询与治疗的研究？以英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所2018年抑郁症指南草案如何考量最佳证据为例进行研究。
Couns Psychother Res. 2017 Dec;17(4):253-268. doi: 10.1002/capr.12141. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
3
State of the Art on the Evidence Base in Cardiac Regenerative Therapy: Overview of 41 Systematic Reviews.心脏再生治疗证据基础的现状：41项系统评价综述
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:613782. doi: 10.1155/2015/613782. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
4
A journey into clinical evidence: from case reports to mixed treatment comparisons.临床证据之旅：从病例报告到混合治疗比较
HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2011;3(2):93-6.
5
Adverse drug reactions.药物不良反应
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jun;73(6):908-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04235.x.
6
A manifesto for clinical pharmacology from principles to practice.从原则到实践：临床药理学宣言。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;70(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03699.x.
7
Systematic review to support the development of nutrient reference intake values: challenges and solutions.系统评价支持营养素参考摄入量值的制定：挑战与解决方案。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Aug;92(2):273-6. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.29092. Epub 2010 May 26.
8
Evaluating the causal relevance of diverse risk markers: horizontal systematic review.评估多种风险标志物的因果相关性：横向系统评价
BMJ. 2009 Nov 5;339:b4265. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4265.
9
The evolution of evidence hierarchies: what can Bradford Hill's 'guidelines for causation' contribute?证据等级体系的演变：布拉德福德·希尔的“因果关系指南”能做出什么贡献？
J R Soc Med. 2009 May;102(5):186-94. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090020.
10
Why do we need Cases Journal?我们为什么需要《病例杂志》？
Cases J. 2008 May 12;1(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-1-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying the effect of folic acid.量化叶酸的作用。
Lancet. 2001 Dec 15;358(9298):2069-73. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)07104-5.
2
Dietary fat intake and prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review.膳食脂肪摄入与心血管疾病预防：系统评价
BMJ. 2001 Mar 31;322(7289):757-63. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7289.757.
3
Neural-tube defects.神经管缺陷
N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 11;341(20):1509-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911113412006.
4
Folic acid and the prevention of neural tube defects.叶酸与神经管缺陷的预防
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Mar 15;678:112-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26114.x.
5
Systematic underestimation of association between serum cholesterol concentration and ischaemic heart disease in observational studies: data from the BUPA study.观察性研究中血清胆固醇浓度与缺血性心脏病之间关联的系统性低估：来自保柏（BUPA）研究的数据
BMJ. 1994 Feb 5;308(6925):363-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6925.363.
6
By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease?血清胆固醇浓度降低多少以及多快能降低缺血性心脏病的风险？
BMJ. 1994 Feb 5;308(6925):367-72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6925.367.
7
Folate levels and neural tube defects. Implications for prevention.叶酸水平与神经管缺陷。预防的意义。
JAMA. 1995 Dec 6;274(21):1698-702. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530210052030.
8
Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group.神经管缺陷的预防：医学研究委员会维生素研究结果。医学研究委员会维生素研究小组
Lancet. 1991 Jul 20;338(8760):131-7.