Suppr超能文献

大量和巨大胸腔积液的病因及胸腔积液特征

Etiology and pleural fluid characteristics of large and massive effusions.

作者信息

Porcel José Manuel, Vives Manuel

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Alcalde Rovira Roure 80, 25198 Lleida, Spain.

出版信息

Chest. 2003 Sep;124(3):978-83. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.3.978.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To report the etiology of large and massive pleural effusions, and to compare their biochemical fluid characteristics with those of smaller size, and between malignant and nonmalignant conditions.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing thoracentesis at an academic medical center in Lleida, Spain, during a 10-year period.

PATIENTS

Posteroanterior chest radiographs were available in 766 patients during the study period. Large pleural effusions (ie, two thirds or more of the hemithorax without its complete obliteration) were identified in 70 patients (9%), and massive pleural effusions (ie, hemithorax was completely opacified) were identified in 93 patients (12%).

RESULTS

A similar etiologic spectrum between large and massive pleural effusions was observed. The most frequent cause of these pleural effusions was malignancy (89 patients; 55%), followed by complicated parapneumonic or empyema (36 patients; 22%), and tuberculosis (19 patients; 12%). Compared with nonmalignant pleural effusions, patients with large or massive malignant pleural effusions were more likely to have pleural fluids with higher RBC counts (18.0 x 10(9) cells/L vs 2.7 x 10(9) cells/L, respectively; p < 0.001) and lower adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity (11.5 vs 31.5 U/L, respectively; p < 0.001), which were the two parameters that were selected by a stepwise logistic-regression model as independent predictors of malignancy. In addition, large/massive malignant pleural effusions showed higher median RBC counts (18.0 x 10(9) cells/L vs 4.3 x 10(9) cells/L, respectively; p < 0.001), higher lactate dehydrogenase levels (641 vs 409 U/L, respectively; p = 0.001), lower pH (7.39 vs 7.42, respectively; p = 0.006) content, but similar cytologic yield (63% vs 53%, respectively; p = 0.171) than smaller malignant pleural effusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a large or massive pleural effusion enables the clinician to narrow the differential diagnosis of pleurisy, since most effusions are secondary to malignancy or infections (either bacterial or mycobacterial). Bloody pleural fluid with low ADA content favors a malignant condition.

摘要

研究目的

报告大量和巨大胸腔积液的病因,并比较其生化液体特征与较小胸腔积液的特征,以及恶性和非恶性情况之间的差异。

设计

对西班牙莱里达一家学术医疗中心10年间接受胸腔穿刺术的所有患者进行回顾性病历审查。

患者

在研究期间,766例患者有后前位胸部X线片。70例患者(9%)被诊断为大量胸腔积液(即胸腔的三分之二或更多,且未完全闭塞),93例患者(12%)被诊断为巨大胸腔积液(即胸腔完全致密)。

结果

观察到大量和巨大胸腔积液的病因谱相似。这些胸腔积液最常见的原因是恶性肿瘤(89例患者;55%),其次是复杂性类肺炎旁胸腔积液或脓胸(36例患者;22%),以及结核病(19例患者;12%)。与非恶性胸腔积液相比,大量或巨大恶性胸腔积液患者的胸腔积液更可能具有较高的红细胞计数(分别为18.0×10⁹个细胞/L和2.7×10⁹个细胞/L;p<0.001)和较低的腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)活性(分别为11.5和31.5 U/L;p<0.001),这两个参数是逐步逻辑回归模型选择的恶性肿瘤独立预测因子。此外,大量/巨大恶性胸腔积液的红细胞计数中位数较高(分别为18.0×10⁹个细胞/L和4.3×10⁹个细胞/L;p<0.001),乳酸脱氢酶水平较高(分别为641和409 U/L;p = 0.001),pH值较低(分别为7.39和7.42;p = 0.006),但与较小的恶性胸腔积液相比,细胞检查阳性率相似(分别为63%和53%;p = 0.171)。

结论

大量或巨大胸腔积液的存在使临床医生能够缩小胸膜炎的鉴别诊断范围,因为大多数积液继发于恶性肿瘤或感染(细菌或分枝杆菌)。ADA含量低的血性胸腔积液提示恶性病变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验