Ireland Anthony J, Knight Helen, Sherriff Martyn
Orthodontic Department, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, UK.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Sep;124(3):323-6. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00403-7.
Self-etching primers have recently been introduced to simplify the orthodontic bonding process. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of such a product with conventional 2-stage etching and priming with 37% o-phosphoric acid and a conventional unfilled primer. Twenty consecutive patients having orthodontic bonds placed were selected to participate in this cross-mouth control study. Diagonally opposite quadrants were randomly allocated to either the self-etching primer group or the conventional etching and priming group. A total of 364 teeth were bonded with a light-cured diacrylate adhesive; bond failures were then monitored over 6 months. There were 20 bond failures (10.99%) in the self-etching primer group and 9 bond failures (4.95%) in the conventional etch and priming group over this period. The results were analyzed with the McNemar test and 95% confidence interval. The difference between the failure proportions was -0.06 with an associated 95% confidence interval of -0.121 to 0.001. This study produced weak evidence to suggest that bond failures with a self-etching primer will be higher than those with conventional etching and priming. This increased likelihood of bond failure must be weighed against the time advantage of the self-etching primer when used at the initial bonding appointment.
自酸蚀底漆最近被引入以简化正畸粘结过程。本研究的目的是比较此类产品与使用37%正磷酸和传统未填充底漆进行的传统两步酸蚀和底漆处理的效果。选择20名连续进行正畸粘结的患者参与这项跨口对照研究。将对角相对的象限随机分配到自酸蚀底漆组或传统酸蚀和底漆组。总共364颗牙齿用光固化双丙烯酸酯粘合剂粘结;然后在6个月内监测粘结失败情况。在此期间,自酸蚀底漆组有20例粘结失败(10.99%),传统酸蚀和底漆组有9例粘结失败(4.95%)。结果用McNemar检验和95%置信区间进行分析。失败比例之间的差异为-0.06,相关的95%置信区间为-0.121至0.001。本研究提供了薄弱证据,表明自酸蚀底漆的粘结失败率将高于传统酸蚀和底漆处理。在初次粘结时使用自酸蚀底漆时,这种增加的粘结失败可能性必须与自酸蚀底漆的时间优势相权衡。