Zakrzewska J M, Boon E C
Barts and the London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, Turner Street, London E1 2AD.
Br Dent J. 2003 Aug 23;195(4):207-9; discussion 198. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810445.
The aim of the present study was to determine what types of dental syringes were being used in British dental schools and whether recent studies on the use of safety syringes had had any impact.
In 2001 a controlled trial showed that avoidable needlestick injuries could be reduced with the introduction of safety syringes which did not require the re-sheathing or removal of a needle from its syringe.
A self complete questionnaire asking about safety syringe use was distributed through the deans of all 16 dental schools in the UK and Ireland.
Fifteen schools formally replied and data are available for the missing one. Two schools have totally converted to the use of safety syringes and in seven schools some departments are using them. Six schools are not considering a change, four others are hoping to change and four are undecided as to whether they are going to change. Five schools had tried them previously. All acknowledge that extensive training is essential, there is also considerable staff resistance and the safety syringes currently available are still not ideal.
All dental schools should determine their avoidable needlestick injuries rates, reconsider their views on the use of safety syringes and contribute to the development of the ideal model.
本研究旨在确定英国牙科学校正在使用哪些类型的牙科注射器,以及近期关于安全注射器使用的研究是否产生了任何影响。
2001年的一项对照试验表明,引入无需重新套上针帽或从注射器上取下针头的安全注射器,可以减少可避免的针刺伤。
通过向英国和爱尔兰所有16所牙科学校的院长分发一份自行填写的关于安全注射器使用情况的问卷来进行调查。
15所学校正式回复,缺失的一所学校的数据也已获取。两所学校已完全改用安全注射器,七所学校的一些部门正在使用。六所学校不考虑改变,另外四所希望改变,还有四所尚未决定是否要改变。五所学校之前曾试用过。所有学校都承认广泛的培训至关重要,同时也存在相当大的员工抵触情绪,而且目前可用的安全注射器仍不理想。
所有牙科学校都应确定其可避免的针刺伤发生率,重新考虑对安全注射器使用的看法,并为理想模式的开发做出贡献。