Damiano R, Autorino R, Perdonà S, De Sio M, Oliva A, Esposito C, Cantiello F, Di Lorenzo G, Sacco R, D'Armiento M
Urologic Clinic, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Italy.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2003;6(3):250-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500671.
The aim of this study is to understand the value of specific sites in extended peripheral and transition zone biopsy schemes in order to define the optimal systematic biopsy regimen correlated with the percentage of positivity of each single bioptic site. A total of 165 consecutive patients underwent transrectal ultrasonography examination to detect prostate cancer followed by a lesion-directed and systematic 14-step biopsy scheme. The detection rate was examined for the lesion-directed and for each zone region biopsy. The frequency of positive biopsies in the various prostate regions was determined to evaluate the diagnostic yield of each biopsy site. Analysis was stratified for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free-to-total PSA ratio, age, prostate size and digital rectal examination. The biopsy protocol detected 40% of patients (66/165) as positive and 55.1% (91/165) as negative for cancer. Standard sextant biopsy was expected to detect only 51 cancer on 66, lateral peripheral (PZ), transition (TZ) and central zone (CZ) biopsies only 56 cancer on 66, while the combination of sextant, PZ, TZ and CZ biopsies, for a total of 14 zone biopsies, detected 64 on 66 patients with cancer (97%) at recruitment. Sampling only the eight prostate regions with higher frequency of positive cancer biopsy was expected to detect 61 cancer patients against the 64 found with the 14-step scheme. This eight-biopsy regimen outperforms the conventional sextant regimen in cancer detection rate (93 vs 77%) and has an overall detection rate lower by only 3.1% (36.9 vs 40%) compared to the 14-biopsy regimen. This difference in detection rate is even smaller in patients with PSA values <10 ng/ml, age <70 y and prostate size <50 ml. This eight-biopsy scheme, including sampling in PZ and TZ toward the base, should be considered in an initial biopsy scheme to maintain a similar detection rate of an extensive biopsy scheme reducing the number of biopsies.
本研究的目的是了解在扩展外周区和移行区活检方案中特定部位的价值,以便确定与每个活检部位阳性率相关的最佳系统活检方案。共有165例连续患者接受经直肠超声检查以检测前列腺癌,随后采用针对病变和系统的14步活检方案。对针对病变的活检以及每个区域的活检的检出率进行了检查。确定各个前列腺区域活检阳性的频率,以评估每个活检部位的诊断率。分析根据前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、游离PSA与总PSA比值、年龄、前列腺大小和直肠指检进行分层。活检方案检测出40%的患者(66/165)癌症阳性,55.1%(91/165)癌症阴性。标准的六分区活检预计在66例中仅能检测出51例癌症,仅外侧外周区(PZ)、移行区(TZ)和中央区(CZ)活检预计在66例中能检测出56例癌症,而六分区、PZ、TZ和CZ活检相结合,总共14个区域活检,在招募时66例癌症患者中检测出64例(97%)。仅对癌症活检阳性频率较高的八个前列腺区域进行采样,预计能检测出61例癌症患者,而14步方案检测出64例。这种八活检方案在癌症检出率方面优于传统的六分区方案(93%对77%),与14活检方案相比,总体检出率仅低3.1%(36.9%对40%)。在PSA值<10 ng/ml,年龄<70岁且前列腺大小<50 ml的患者中,这种检出率差异更小。这种八活检方案,包括在PZ和TZ向基底部采样,应在初始活检方案中予以考虑,以保持与广泛活检方案相似的检出率,同时减少活检次数。