Baker John, Blackwell Michael, Buss Daryl, Eyre Peter, Held Joe R, Ogilvie Tim, Pappaioanou Marguerite, Sawyer Leigh
College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, USA.
J Vet Med Educ. 2003 Summer;30(2):164-72. doi: 10.3138/jvme.30.2.164.
It is clear that the profession is not well prepared to respond to society's needs in bio-defense and public health. The imperatives that face the veterinary profession, as emphasized by the agenda for action conference deliberations that are reported in this issue of the journal, require action on many fronts, but possibly none more essential than to address how veterinary education needs to change to meet these challenges. Addressing these needs, participants at the agenda for action conference met in groups of 30 to 50 to shape approaches that would address these key questions. The 161 participants were broadly representative of government, private practice, corporate practice, organized veterinary medicine, and academia (Appendix A). Reported here are the results of those deliberations, with each of the seven sections written up by the discussion leader. Included in the participants were 20 students, representative of eight different veterinary colleges, who both participated in the group discussions and have presented their own report.
显然,该行业在应对生物防御和公共卫生方面的社会需求时准备不足。正如本期杂志报道的行动议程会议审议所强调的,兽医行业面临的当务之急需要在多个方面采取行动,但可能没有比解决兽医教育需要如何改变以应对这些挑战更重要的了。为满足这些需求,行动议程会议的参与者分成30至50人的小组,以制定应对这些关键问题的方法。161名参与者广泛代表了政府、私人执业、企业执业、组织化的兽医学以及学术界(附录A)。这里报告的是这些审议的结果,七个部分中的每一部分均由讨论负责人撰写。参与者中有20名学生,代表八所不同的兽医学院,他们既参加了小组讨论,也提交了自己的报告。