• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术自我概念中的“大鱼小池塘效应”。对学术择优学校负面影响的跨文化(26个国家)测试。

Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools.

作者信息

Marsh Herbert W, Hau Kit-Tai

机构信息

SELF Research Centre, University of Western Sydney, Bankstown Campus, Penrith, New South Wales 1797, Australia.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2003 May;58(5):364-76. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.5.364.

DOI:10.1037/0003-066x.58.5.364
PMID:12971085
Abstract

Academically selective schools are intended to affect academic self-concept positively, but theoretical and empirical research demonstrates that the effects are negative. The big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE), an application of social comparison theory to educational settings, posits that a student will have a lower academic self-concept in an academically selective school than in a nonselective school. This study, the largest cross-cultural study of the BFLPE ever undertaken, tested theoretical predictions for nationally representative samples of approximately 4,000 15-year-olds from each of 26 countries (N = 103,558) who completed the same self-concept instrument and achievement tests. Consistent with the BFLPE, the effects of school-average achievement were negative in all 26 countries (M beta = -.20, SD = .08), demonstrating the BFLPE's cross-cultural generalizability.

摘要

学术选拔性学校旨在对学术自我概念产生积极影响,但理论和实证研究表明,其影响是负面的。大鱼小池塘效应(BFLPE)是社会比较理论在教育环境中的应用,它假定学生在学术选拔性学校中的学术自我概念会低于非选拔性学校。本研究是有史以来规模最大的关于大鱼小池塘效应的跨文化研究,针对来自26个国家的约4000名15岁青少年(N = 103,558)的具有全国代表性的样本进行了测试,这些青少年完成了相同 的自我概念量表和成绩测试。与大鱼小池塘效应一致,学校平均成绩的影响在所有26个国家都是负面的(M beta = -.20,SD = .08),证明了大鱼小池塘效应的跨文化普遍性。

相似文献

1
Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools.学术自我概念中的“大鱼小池塘效应”。对学术择优学校负面影响的跨文化(26个国家)测试。
Am Psychol. 2003 May;58(5):364-76. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.58.5.364.
2
The big-fish-little-pond effect on mathematics self-concept: Evidence from the United Arab Emirates.大鱼小池塘效应在数学自我概念方面的体现:来自阿拉伯联合酋长国的证据。
J Adolesc. 2017 Aug;59:148-154. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools.大鱼小池塘效应影响学业自我概念的纵向多层次模型:平衡香港学校中的对比效应和反射荣耀效应
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Feb;78(2):337-49. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.337.
4
The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect for Academic Self-Concept, Test Anxiety, and School Grades in Gifted Children.天才儿童学术自我概念、考试焦虑和学业成绩的大鱼小池塘效应
Contemp Educ Psychol. 1999 Oct;24(4):305-329. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0985.
5
Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): an integrative study.厘清社会比较在大鱼小池塘效应(BFLPE)中的作用:一项整合性研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):156-70. doi: 10.1037/a0015558.
6
The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: A Meta-Analysis.“大鱼小池塘效应”对学业自我概念的影响:一项元分析
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 29;9:1569. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01569. eCollection 2018.
7
In search of the big fish: investigating the coexistence of the big-fish-little-pond effect with the positive effects of upward comparisons.寻找大鱼:探究大鱼小池塘效应与向上比较的积极影响的共存情况。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Mar;47(Pt 1):73-103. doi: 10.1348/014466607X202309.
8
Big fish in a big pond: a study of academic self concept in first year medical students.大池塘里的大鱼:一年级医学生学术自我概念研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Jul 27;11:48. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-48.
9
Academic self-concept in high school: predictors and effects on adjustment in higher education.高中阶段的学业自我概念:对高等教育适应的预测因素及其影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2011 Dec;52(6):586-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00905.x. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
10
Big fish in big ponds: Contrast and assimilation effects on math and verbal self-concepts of students in within-school gifted tracks.大池塘里的大鱼:校内资优班学生数学和语言自我概念的对比与同化效应
Br J Educ Psychol. 2016 Jun;86(2):222-40. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12100. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Being the Best, or With the Best: A Developmental Examination of Children's Choices in a Social Comparison Dilemma.成为最佳,还是与最佳同行:对儿童在社会比较困境中选择的发展性考察。
Dev Sci. 2025 May;28(3):e70017. doi: 10.1111/desc.70017.
2
Academic Success at Social Costs: An Exploratory Study on Social Networks of Chinese Students under Academic Streaming.以社会成本换取学业成功:对学业分流下中国学生社交网络的探索性研究。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):164-180. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14010011.
3
Children's peer relationships, well-being, and academic achievement: the mediating role of academic competence.
儿童的同伴关系、幸福感与学业成绩:学业能力的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 12;14:1174127. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174127. eCollection 2023.
4
The Relationship between Ninth Graders' Perceptions of Teacher Equity and Their Math Identity: Differences by Student Race and School Racial Composition.九年级学生对教师公平性的认知与其数学身份认同之间的关系:学生种族和学校种族构成的差异
Sociol Educ. 2023 Apr;96(2):129-148. doi: 10.1177/00380407221149016. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
5
Achievement Emotions in Selective Schools: Reexamining the Happy-Fish-Little-Pond Effect in an Extreme Case from the Chinese Collectivist Context.重点学校的成就情绪:在中国集体主义背景下,从一个极端案例重新审视“快乐小鱼小池塘效应”。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):15399. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215399.
6
A Big Five-Based Multimethod Social and Emotional Skills Assessment: The Mosaic™ by ACT Social Emotional Learning Assessment.基于大五人格的多方法社会情感技能评估:美国大学考试(ACT)社会情感学习评估的Mosaic™
J Intell. 2022 Sep 20;10(4):72. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040072.
7
Adolescents' future in the balance of family, school, and the neighborhood: A multidimensional application of two theoretical perspectives.青少年的未来维系于家庭、学校和社区之间:两种理论视角的多维应用
Soc Sci Q. 2022 May;103(3):534-549. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13137. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
8
Academic Self-Concept Dramatically Declines in Secondary School: Personal and Contextual Determinants.学术自我概念在中学阶段急剧下降:个人和环境的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 4;19(5):3010. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053010.
9
Parental Evaluation of the Socio-Personal Adjustment of High Ability Students in a Cluster Grouping Program.在分组计划中对高能力学生社会个人适应情况的家长评估
Children (Basel). 2022 Jan 2;9(1):44. doi: 10.3390/children9010044.
10
Teachers' Use of Within-Class Ability Groups in the Primary Classroom: A Mixed Methods Study of Social Comparison.教师在小学课堂中对班级内能力分组的运用:一项关于社会比较的混合方法研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 6;12:728104. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728104. eCollection 2021.