Becker L R, Zaloshnja E, Levick N, Li Guohua, Miller Ted R
Public Services Research Institute, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 11,710 Beltsville Drive, Suite 300, Calverton, MD 20705-3102, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Nov;35(6):941-8. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00102-1.
This study addresses of the impacts of emergency vehicle (ambulances, police cars and fire trucks) occupant seating position, restraint use and vehicle response status on injuries and fatalities. Multi-way frequency and ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed on two large national databases, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and the General Estimates System (GES). One model estimated the relative risk ratios for different levels of injury severity to occupants traveling in ambulances. Restrained ambulance occupants involved in a crash were significantly less likely to be killed or seriously injured than unrestrained occupants. Ambulance rear occupants were significantly more likely to be killed than front-seat occupants. Ambulance occupants traveling non-emergency were more likely than occupants traveling emergency to be killed or severely injured. Unrestrained ambulance occupants, occupants riding in the patient compartment and especially unrestrained occupants riding in the patient compartment were at substantially increased risk of injury and death when involved in a crash. A second model incorporated police cars and fire trucks. In the combined ambulance-fire truck-police car model, the likelihood of an occupant fatality for those involved in a crash was higher for routine responses. Relative to police cars and fire trucks, ambulances experienced the highest percentage of fatal crashes where occupants are killed and the highest percentage of crashes where occupants are injured. Lack of restraint use and/or responding with 'lights and siren' characterized the vast majority of fatalities among fire truck occupants. A third model incorporated non-special use van and passenger car occupants, which otherwise replicated the second model. Our findings suggest that ambulance crewmembers riding in the back and firefighters in any seating position, should be restrained whenever feasible. Family members accompanying ambulance patients should ride in the front-seat of the ambulance.
本研究探讨了应急车辆(救护车、警车和消防车)乘员的座位位置、约束装置使用情况以及车辆响应状态对伤亡情况的影响。对两个大型国家数据库——美国国家公路交通安全管理局的死亡分析报告系统(FARS)和综合估计系统(GES)进行了多向频率分析和有序逻辑回归分析。一个模型估计了救护车中不同损伤严重程度的乘员的相对风险比。与未系约束装置的乘员相比,发生碰撞时系了约束装置的救护车乘员死亡或受重伤的可能性显著降低。救护车后排乘员死亡的可能性明显高于前排乘员。非紧急出诊的救护车乘员比执行紧急任务的乘员更有可能死亡或受重伤。未系约束装置的救护车乘员、坐在病人车厢内的乘员,尤其是坐在病人车厢内且未系约束装置的乘员,在发生碰撞时受伤和死亡的风险大幅增加。第二个模型纳入了警车和消防车。在救护车 - 消防车 - 警车的综合模型中,参与碰撞的乘员在常规响应时死亡的可能性更高。相对于警车和消防车,救护车发生乘员死亡的致命碰撞百分比最高,发生乘员受伤的碰撞百分比也最高。消防车乘员绝大多数死亡案例的特点是未使用约束装置和/或以“警灯和警笛”响应。第三个模型纳入了非特殊用途厢式车和乘用车乘员,该模型在其他方面复制了第二个模型。我们的研究结果表明,只要可行,坐在后排的救护车工作人员以及任何座位位置的消防员都应系上约束装置。陪同救护车患者的家属应坐在救护车的前排。