Maffiuletti Nicola A, Lepers Romuald
Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Sep;35(9):1511-6. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000084426.03247.93.
To compare voluntary and electrically evoked knee extensor torque, surface electromyography (EMG), and activation level obtained under seated versus supine position, i.e., with shortened versus lengthened rectus femoris (RF) muscle.
The knee extensor torque obtained during maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) and after single and paired stimuli applied at rest was measured under seated (i.e., 90 degrees hip angle) and supine (i.e., 180 degrees hip angle) conditions. The associated EMG activity from biarticular RF and monoarticular vasti was also recorded, and activation level was estimated by means of the twitch interpolation technique.
Knee extensor MVC was 10.6% higher in the seated compared with the supine position (P < 0.01). EMG normalized to the M-wave amplitude for respective muscles and for respective positions was significantly lower under supine conditions, and deficits averaged approximately 20% for vasti and approximately 41% for RF (P < 0.05). Similarly, activation level estimated in the supine position was approximately 4% lower than the seated counterpart. Relative MVC losses observed supinely were significantly correlated with the corresponding activation level deficits (P < 0.05). On the other hand, both single and paired stimuli resulted in higher torque amplitudes in the supine with respect to the seated position, and mean differences were comprised between 10% (single twitch, P < 0.05) and 20% (potentiated doublet, P < 0.001). RF M-wave amplitude recorded supinely was 19% higher than the seated counterpart (P < 0.01).
The higher neural activation observed for the knee extensor muscles in the seated versus supine position, likely attributable to improved motor unit recruitment, may reflect a neurophysiological mechanism partly compensating the neuromuscular transmission-propagation impairment and/or mechanical disadvantage of shortened RF muscle.
比较在坐姿与仰卧位(即股直肌 [RF] 肌肉缩短与拉长状态)下获得的自愿性和电诱发的膝关节伸肌扭矩、表面肌电图(EMG)以及激活水平。
在坐姿(即髋关节角度为90度)和仰卧位(即髋关节角度为180度)条件下,测量最大自愿收缩(MVC)期间以及静息时施加单次和配对刺激后获得的膝关节伸肌扭矩。还记录了双关节RF和单关节股四头肌的相关EMG活动,并通过抽搐插值技术估计激活水平。
与仰卧位相比,坐姿时膝关节伸肌MVC高10.6%(P < 0.01)。仰卧位条件下,各肌肉和各位置的EMG相对于M波振幅进行归一化后显著降低,股四头肌平均 deficits 约为20%,RF约为41%(P < 0.05)。同样,仰卧位估计的激活水平比坐姿时低约4%。仰卧位观察到的相对MVC损失与相应的激活水平 deficits 显著相关(P < 0.05)。另一方面,单次和配对刺激在仰卧位时产生的扭矩幅度相对于坐姿更高,平均差异在10%(单次抽搐,P < 0.05)和20%(增强双脉冲,P < 0.001)之间。仰卧位记录的RF M波振幅比坐姿时高19%(P < 0.01)。
坐姿相对于仰卧位时膝关节伸肌观察到更高的神经激活,可能归因于运动单位募集的改善,这可能反映了一种神经生理机制,部分补偿了神经肌肉传递 - 传播损伤和/或缩短的RF肌肉的机械劣势。