Suppr超能文献

肌腱移植重建喙锁韧带:一项比较生物力学研究。

Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments with tendon grafts: a comparative biomechanical study.

作者信息

Lee Steven J, Nicholas Stephen J, Akizuki Kenneth H, McHugh Malachy P, Kremenic Ian J, Ben-Avi Simon

机构信息

Nicholas Institute of Sports Medicine and Athletic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital. The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, New York, New York 10021, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;31(5):648-55. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310050301.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous surgical techniques have been described to address injuries to the coracoclavicular ligaments.

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical properties of tendon graft reconstructions with those of the native coracoclavicular ligaments and various other repair methods.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eleven fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were tensile tested to failure to compare the biomechanical properties of the native coracoclavicular ligaments, coracoacromial ligament transfer, No. 5 Mersilene suture repair, 5-mm Mersilene tape repair, and tendon graft reconstructions with gracilis, semitendinosus, and long toe extensor tendons.

RESULTS

Reconstructions with semitendinosus, gracilis, or long toe extensor tendon grafts were found to have superior initial biomechanical properties compared with coracoacromial ligament transfer; failure strengths were as strong as those of the native coracoclavicular ligaments. Failure of the tendon grafts occurred through the midsubstance of the tendon graft, not at the fixation site.

CONCLUSIONS

Tendon graft reconstruction may be an alternative to coracoacromial ligament transfer and may provide a permanent biologic reconstruction with superior initial biomechanical properties, including that of tensile strength.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Use of tendon graft reconstruction may limit the need for postoperative immobilization and lead to an accelerated rehabilitation program.

摘要

背景

已有多种手术技术用于处理喙锁韧带损伤。

目的

比较肌腱移植重建与天然喙锁韧带及其他各种修复方法的生物力学特性。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

对11具新鲜冷冻的人体尸体肩部进行拉伸试验直至失效,以比较天然喙锁韧带、喙肩韧带转移、5号肠线缝合修复、5毫米肠线带修复以及使用股薄肌、半腱肌和长趾伸肌腱进行肌腱移植重建的生物力学特性。

结果

发现使用半腱肌、股薄肌或长趾伸肌腱移植进行的重建与喙肩韧带转移相比,具有更好的初始生物力学特性;失效强度与天然喙锁韧带一样强。肌腱移植的失效发生在肌腱移植的中部,而非固定部位。

结论

肌腱移植重建可能是喙肩韧带转移的一种替代方法,并且可以提供具有更好初始生物力学特性(包括拉伸强度)的永久性生物重建。

临床意义

使用肌腱移植重建可能会减少术后固定的需求,并导致加速康复计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验