Kim Tae Kyun, Rauh Peter B, McFarland Edward G
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;31(5):744-50. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310051801.
Prevalence and clinical significance of partial tears of the subscapularis tendon have not been widely studied.
To determine prevalence of and clinical factors associated with partial tears of the subscapularis tendon at arthroscopy.
Case control study.
During arthroscopic procedures on 314 consecutive shoulders, the arthroscopically visible portion of the subscapularis tendon was probed. Patients with and without partial tears were compared for prospectively identified variables.
Partial tears were found in 60 of the 314 patients (19%). Increasing age and dominant arm involvement were significant variables for partial tears. Significantly associated factors included supraspinatus tendon tears (54 of 60; 90%), rotator cuff disease (44 of 60, 73%), and posterosuperior labral fraying (34 of 47, 72%). Increasing age, dominant arm involvement, and coexisting infraspinatus tendon tears were strong independent risk factors for partial tears.
Partial tears of the subscapularis tendon are not uncommon findings during shoulder arthroscopic procedures and are associated with extensive rotator cuff disease. They do not appear to be associated with glenohumeral instability, but a possible association with atypical forms of instability (subclinical or superior instability) cannot be excluded by this study. The absence of a significant association between the lesion and specific subjective symptoms or physical findings suggests that caution should be taken when attributing a specific symptom to this condition.
肩胛下肌腱部分撕裂的患病率及临床意义尚未得到广泛研究。
确定关节镜检查时肩胛下肌腱部分撕裂的患病率及相关临床因素。
病例对照研究。
在对连续314例肩部进行关节镜手术过程中,对肩胛下肌腱关节镜可见部分进行探查。比较有和没有部分撕裂的患者的前瞻性确定变量。
314例患者中有60例(19%)发现部分撕裂。年龄增加和优势侧手臂受累是部分撕裂的显著变量。显著相关因素包括冈上肌腱撕裂(60例中的54例;90%)、肩袖疾病(60例中的44例,73%)和后上盂唇磨损(47例中的34例,72%)。年龄增加、优势侧手臂受累和并存的冈下肌腱撕裂是部分撕裂的强烈独立危险因素。
肩胛下肌腱部分撕裂在肩关节镜手术中并非罕见发现,且与广泛的肩袖疾病相关。它们似乎与盂肱关节不稳定无关,但本研究不能排除与非典型不稳定形式(亚临床或上方不稳定)的可能关联。病变与特定主观症状或体格检查结果之间缺乏显著关联表明,将特定症状归因于这种情况时应谨慎。