Geldner G, Lang C, Hoffmann W, Hossfeld A, Weinberger J, Eble M, Blobner M
Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2003 Sep;38(9):594-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41857.
This study was designed to compare the time course of action and the safety profile of Rapacuronium and Mivacurium in day case dental surgery. After Ethics Committee approval 61 healthy adult patients, scheduled for dental day case surgery, were randomised in an assessor-blinded manner to receive either 1.5 mg/kg Rapacuronium with and without 0.05 neostigmine 5 min later (19 patients each) or a total of 0.25 mg/kg Mivacurium (n = 16). Anaesthesia was induced using Propofol 2 - 5.1 mg/kg and Remifentanil 24 - 73 mcg/kg/h and maintained with Desflurane in N2O/O2 (2/1). Endotracheal intubation was performed when maximum blockade was achieved and scored by a blinded intubator. Neuromuscular block was monitored using the train-of-four response to supramaximal stimuli at the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds using acceleromyography (TOF Watch SX). Onset time, clinical duration (reappearance of the third twitch of a TOF-stimulation) and recovery to T4/T1 > 0.9 were recorded. Speed of recovery was evaluated by the time difference between reappearance of the third twitch and T4/T1 > 0.9. The intubating conditions at the time of maximum block revealed no statistically significant differences between the three groups. Changes in blood pressure, heart rate and airway pressure were not significant. Onset time in subjects who received Rapacuronium (99 +/- 29 s) was faster compared to the onset time in those who received Mivacurium (157 +/- 36 s). Also clinical duration was significantly shorter following Rapacuronium without reversal (12 +/- 4 min) as well as with reversal (9 +/- 1 min) compared with Mivacurium (21 +/- 5 min)). Patients treated with Rapacuronium and reversal recovered faster (14 +/- 8 min)) compared to the other two groups (Mivacurium: 20 +/- 6 min, Rapacuronium without reversal: 31 +/- 9 min). The fraction of clinical duration of the total duration was highest following Mivacurium (51 %) when compared with Rapacuronium/Neostigmine (43 %) and Rapacuronium (28 %).
本研究旨在比较罗库溴铵和米库氯铵在日间牙科手术中的作用时程和安全性。经伦理委员会批准后,将61例计划进行日间牙科手术的健康成年患者,以评估者盲法随机分为三组,每组19例接受1.5mg/kg罗库溴铵,其中两组分别在5分钟后加用或不加用0.05mg新斯的明,另一组16例接受总量0.25mg/kg米库氯铵。使用丙泊酚2 - 5.1mg/kg和瑞芬太尼24 - 73mcg/kg/h诱导麻醉,并用N2O/O2(2/1)中的地氟醚维持麻醉。当达到最大阻滞时进行气管插管,并由一位盲法插管者进行评分。使用加速度肌电图(TOF Watch SX)每15秒在尺神经给予超强刺激,用四个成串刺激监测神经肌肉阻滞。记录起效时间、临床作用时间(四个成串刺激中第三个肌颤搐再现)和恢复至T4/T1>0.9的时间。通过第三个肌颤搐再现与T4/T1>0.9之间的时间差评估恢复速度。最大阻滞时的插管条件在三组之间无统计学显著差异。血压、心率和气道压力的变化不显著。接受罗库溴铵的受试者的起效时间(99±29秒)比接受米库氯铵的受试者的起效时间(157±36秒)快。与米库氯铵(21±5分钟)相比,未用拮抗剂的罗库溴铵组(12±4分钟)以及用拮抗剂的罗库溴铵组(9±1分钟)的临床作用时间也显著更短。与其他两组(米库氯铵组:20±6分钟,未用拮抗剂的罗库溴铵组:31±9分钟)相比,接受罗库溴铵并用拮抗剂治疗的患者恢复更快(14±8分钟)。与罗库溴铵/新斯的明组(43%)和罗库溴铵组(28%)相比,米库氯铵组临床作用时间占总时间的比例最高(51%)。