Coceani F, Lees J, Redford J, Bishai I
Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont., Canada.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1992 Dec;70(12):1590-6. doi: 10.1139/y92-228.
Conscious cats were used to examine the effectiveness of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist against the fever induced by interleukin-1 and endotoxin. Although inactive by itself, the antagonist (three 1-micrograms bolus injections at 10-min intervals), injected into the third ventricle, attenuated the febrile response to a subsequent intracerebroventricular bolus of interleukin-1. The rise in prostaglandin E2 levels in cerebrospinal fluid, which is a characteristic feature of fever, was curtailed as well. The interleukin-1 antagonist had little or no inhibitory effect on the response to an intracerebroventricular bolus of endotoxin, even though a higher dose was employed (2-micrograms bolus injections given three times at 10-min intervals and six times at 30-min intervals, respectively, before and after endotoxin administration). At either dosage, the intracerebroventricular antagonist was completely ineffective against an intravenous bolus injection of interleukin-1 or endotoxin and both fever and prostaglandin E2 elevation developed unabated. We conclude that brain receptors mediating the pyrogenic action of centrally injected interleukin-1 are susceptible to the antagonist. The same receptors, however, are seemingly not activated by systemic pyrogens. Our findings are consistent with the concept of circulating interleukin-1 acting outside the blood-brain barrier in the normal sequence of fever.
清醒的猫被用于研究白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂对抗白细胞介素-1和内毒素所致发热的效果。尽管该拮抗剂本身无活性,但经脑室注射(每隔10分钟推注3次,每次1微克)后,可减弱随后脑室内推注白细胞介素-1引起的发热反应。脑脊液中前列腺素E2水平的升高(发热的一个特征性表现)也受到抑制。白细胞介素-1拮抗剂对内毒素脑室内推注的反应几乎没有抑制作用,即便使用了更高剂量(分别在内毒素给药前后,每隔10分钟推注2微克,共3次,每隔30分钟推注2微克,共6次)。无论哪种剂量,脑室内拮抗剂对白细胞介素-1或内毒素静脉推注均完全无效,发热和前列腺素E2升高均不受影响地出现。我们得出结论,介导中枢注射白细胞介素-1致热作用的脑受体对该拮抗剂敏感。然而,同样的受体似乎不会被全身热原激活。我们的发现与正常发热过程中循环白细胞介素-1在血脑屏障外发挥作用的概念一致。