Goldberg A M, Silber P M
Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lens Eye Toxic Res. 1992;9(3-4):161-92.
This paper reviews advances in the validation of alternative methods for eye irritation testing since the 1987 publication, A Critical Evaluation of Alternatives to Acute Ocular Irritation Testing (1). We have highlighted details of methods that appear promising and identified the minimum needs and endpoints necessary to develop a battery or batteries of in vitro tests to evaluate eye irritancy. We have recommended a series of workshops to provide identified batteries for specific classes of chemicals or for specific uses of eye irritancy testing. We have also identified the need for consensus meetings and peer-reviewed publication to ensure that the most predictive batteries become parts of validation studies. Finally, we note that academic scientists, industry, government and the animal protection community must work together in order to replace in vivo eye irritancy testing with appropriately validated in vitro methods.
本文回顾了自1987年发表《急性眼刺激试验替代方法的批判性评估》(1)以来,眼刺激试验替代方法验证方面的进展。我们重点介绍了看似有前景的方法细节,并确定了开发一套或多套体外试验以评估眼刺激性所需的最低要求和终点指标。我们建议举办一系列研讨会,为特定类别的化学品或眼刺激试验的特定用途提供已确定的试验组合。我们还指出需要召开共识会议并进行同行评审出版,以确保最具预测性的试验组合成为验证研究的一部分。最后,我们指出学术科学家、行业、政府和动物保护团体必须共同努力,以便用经过适当验证的体外方法取代体内眼刺激试验。