Anidjar M, Delmas V, Villers A, Blanc E, Boccon-Gibod L, Corring T
Clinique Urologique, Hôpital Bichat, Paris.
Prog Urol. 1992 Aug-Sep;2(4):592-603.
In order to define the best method for endosurgical dissection of the upper urinary tract, an experimental study comparing the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches was performed. Between September 1991 and February 1992, 15 female pigs and 8 human cadavres underwent endosurgical dissection of the upper urinary tract. The retroperitoneal approach was used in 8 pigs and 5 cadavres. In the lateral supine position, the retroperitoneum was insufflated at the lower pole of the kidney, via a 2 cm cutaneo-muscular incision, followed by a blind dissection with the finger to create a space in the retroperitoneal fat. Four trocars were inserted into the retroperitoneal space allowing dissection of the ureter, kidney and its vascular pedicle. The renal vessels and the ureter were then clipped or stapled with the endo-GIA then sectioned. The operation was successfully performed in all of the pigs with a mean operating time of 2 hours. Complications were limited to two peritoneal effractions. Retroperitoneal endosurgical dissection was much longer and more difficult to perform on the cadavre (mean operating time: 3 hours). Satisfactory retropneumoperitoneum was never able to be obtained due to the large amount of retroperitoneal fat and the proximity of the twelfth rib and posterior iliac crest interfered with the insertion of the trocars and made dissection more difficult. The transperitoneal approach was performed in 7 pigs and three cadavres. In the lateral supine position, after creating pneumoperitoneum using a Veress needle, 4 trocars were inserted into the peritoneal cavity. Toldt's fascia was gripped and incised allowing retraction of the colon towards the midline, thereby exposing the renal region. The ureter and the renal vessels were dissected. The renal artery and vein were then clipped or stapled with the endo-GIA then sectioned, while the ureter was clipped and sectioned. The complications of the transperitoneal route were: an injury to the small intestine during insertion of a trocar and haemorrhage due to accidental section of a lower pole renal artery, which was able to be controlled by application of clips. In the pig, the transperitoneal approach was as simple to perform as the retroperitoneal approach and the mean operating time was the same (two hours).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
为了确定上尿路腔内手术解剖的最佳方法,进行了一项比较腹膜后和经腹途径的实验研究。1991年9月至1992年2月期间,对15头雌性猪和8具人类尸体进行了上尿路腔内手术解剖。8头猪和5具尸体采用腹膜后途径。在侧卧位,通过一个2厘米的皮肤肌肉切口在肾下极对腹膜后进行充气,然后用手指盲目解剖以在腹膜后脂肪中制造一个空间。将4个套管针插入腹膜后间隙,以便对输尿管、肾脏及其血管蒂进行解剖。然后用腔内切割吻合器(endo-GIA)夹住或钉合肾血管和输尿管,然后切断。所有猪的手术均成功完成,平均手术时间为2小时。并发症仅限于两处腹膜破裂。在尸体上进行腹膜后腔内手术解剖要长得多且更困难(平均手术时间:3小时)。由于腹膜后脂肪量较大,且第十二肋和髂后嵴位置较近,干扰了套管针的插入并使解剖更加困难,因此从未获得满意的腹膜后充气。7头猪和3具尸体采用经腹途径。在侧卧位,使用韦雷氏针制造气腹后,将4个套管针插入腹腔。抓住并切开托尔特筋膜,使结肠向中线回缩,从而暴露肾区。解剖输尿管和肾血管。然后用腔内切割吻合器夹住或钉合肾动脉和静脉,然后切断,同时夹住并切断输尿管。经腹途径的并发症有:套管针插入期间小肠损伤以及因意外切断肾下极动脉导致的出血,通过应用夹子得以控制。在猪身上,经腹途径与腹膜后途径操作同样简单,平均手术时间相同(2小时)。(摘要截取自400字)