Sharma S K, Pande J N, Dey A B, Verma K
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
Natl Med J India. 1992 Jul-Aug;5(4):162-6.
The role of fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of bronchogenic carcinoma is well established. However, in developing countries, where the burden of illness is large and diagnostic facilities are limited, only a small number of patients are diagnosed at a stage when they might benefit from operation. We felt it would be desirable to identify subsets of patients suspected of harbouring lung cancers, in whom bronchoscopy would have not only a high diagnostic yield but also provide useful information which might influence treatment, the patient's quality of life and duration of survival.
We analysed the records of 588 patients, who had been bronchoscoped for suspected lung cancer, over a period of 8 years at a tertiary referral centre in north India. The patients were divided into different clinical subgroups on the basis of their clinical and radiological presentation, and the diagnostic yield from bronchoscopy in each group was calculated. A decision analysis model was constructed and the expected value of clinical information was determined for each group.
A tissue diagnosis was established by bronchoscopy in 177 (30%) patients and by additional investigations in 43 (7.3%) patients. A positive tissue diagnosis was obtained most often in patients with clinical and radiological evidence of pulmonary collapse (50%) and mass lesions (38-42%). Only 12% of patients with malignancy underwent resection and 70% of them belonged to the above two groups. The expected value of clinical information was greatest in patients with collapse (0.077) or mass lesions (0.067-0.065).
A diagnostic work-up including fibreoptic bronchoscopy is indicated early in patients with collapse or mass lesions of the lung. Patients with non-resolving pneumonia, pleural effusion, metastatic disease and non-specific lesions on chest X-ray should receive a low priority for bronchoscopy.