Charlton P, Fell R, Henshall A
Child Care Health Dev. 1975 May-Jun;1(3):191-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1975.tb00012.x.
This short article is primarily concerned with, what the authors consider to be, two important considerations in any form of residential child care, particularly long-term: 1 The great need for a coherent overall philosophy, which is clearly understood by all members of staff. It is felt that, all too often, assumptions are made about general agreement, which are not necessarily borne out by observed practice. 2 The need for the meticulous selection of primary caring staff, followed by relevant in-service training rather than an overreliance upon, what are sometimes, quite arbitrary qualifications. The article attempts to present a broad profile of a unit which, although it does not claim to represent the ideal, is nonetheless beginning to assume a purposive and identifiable character. The point is made that clinicism, professionalism and academic discussion are important but they are not the only considerations. The children must remain the raison d'etre for such a unit, not the justification. The authors hope to have conveyed their conviction that cooperation and communication between the members of a multidisciplinary team presents the most practical and the most productive approach to the care of profoundly and multiply handicapped children.
这篇短文主要关注作者认为在任何形式的儿童寄宿照料中,尤其是长期照料中两个重要的考量因素:1. 迫切需要一套连贯的总体理念,且全体工作人员都要清楚理解。人们认为,常常有人假定存在普遍共识,但实际观察到的做法未必能证实这一点。2. 需要精心挑选主要照料人员,随后进行相关在职培训,而不是过度依赖有时相当随意的资质。本文试图勾勒出一个机构的大致概况,该机构虽不宣称代表理想模式,但已开始呈现出目标明确、易于识别的特点。文中指出,临床主义、专业精神和学术讨论固然重要,但并非唯一的考量因素。儿童必须始终是这样一个机构存在的理由,而非其存在的借口。作者希望已传达出他们的信念,即多学科团队成员之间的合作与沟通是照料重度和多重残疾儿童最切实可行且最有成效的方法。