• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

洛美沙星与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗单纯性尿路感染的安全性和有效性比较:一项多中心研究的结果

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of lomefloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections: results from a multicenter study.

作者信息

Andrade-Villanueva J, Flores-Gaxiola A, Lopez-Guillen P, Aguirre-Avalos G, Morfin-Otero R, Rodriguez-Noriega E

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Division, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1992 Apr 6;92(4A):71S-74S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90313-z.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(92)90313-z
PMID:1316074
Abstract

Lomefloxacin, a new difluorinated quinolone, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) were compared in the treatment of adults with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. The study was conducted as a multicenter, controlled, prospectively randomized, single-blind study in five countries (Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela). A total of 254 patients were enrolled: 129 in the lomefloxacin group and 125 in the TMP/SMX group. Patients received either 400 mg lomefloxacin orally once daily or 160 mg/800 mg TMP/SMX orally twice daily for 7-10 days. Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis were the pathogens most frequently isolated. At 5-9 days post-therapy, satisfactory bacteriologic results were noted in 98.4% of patients treated with lomefloxacin and in 95.8% of patients in the TMP/SMX group (p = 0.2153). Clinical success 5-9 days post-therapy was noted in 99.2% of patients in the lomefloxacin group and in 98.3% of patients in the TMP/SMX group (p = 0.5138). Adverse events probably related to treatment occurred in 6% of those treated with lomefloxacin and in 7% of patients treated with TMP/SMX. Once-daily oral lomefloxacin is a well-tolerated and effective treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections caused by susceptible pathogens.

摘要

洛美沙星是一种新型二氟喹诺酮类药物,将其与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑(TMP/SMX)用于治疗无并发症的成人尿路感染进行比较。该研究在五个国家(阿根廷、比利时、巴西、墨西哥和委内瑞拉)进行,是一项多中心、对照、前瞻性随机单盲研究。共纳入254例患者:洛美沙星组129例,TMP/SMX组125例。患者接受每日一次口服400mg洛美沙星或每日两次口服160mg/800mg TMP/SMX,疗程7 - 10天。大肠埃希菌和奇异变形杆菌是最常分离出的病原体。治疗后5 - 9天,洛美沙星治疗组98.4%的患者细菌学结果满意,TMP/SMX组为95.8%(p = 0.2153)。治疗后5 - 9天,洛美沙星组99.2%的患者临床治愈,TMP/SMX组为98.3%(p = 0.5138)。洛美沙星治疗组6%的患者和TMP/SMX治疗组7%的患者出现可能与治疗相关的不良事件。每日一次口服洛美沙星对由敏感病原体引起的无并发症尿路感染是一种耐受性良好且有效的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of lomefloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections: results from a multicenter study.洛美沙星与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗单纯性尿路感染的安全性和有效性比较:一项多中心研究的结果
Am J Med. 1992 Apr 6;92(4A):71S-74S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90313-z.
2
Uncomplicated urinary tract infections: lomefloxacin versus trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole.单纯性尿路感染:洛美沙星与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑的比较
J Int Med Res. 1992 Nov;20(6):467-74. doi: 10.1177/030006059202000604.
3
A multicenter study of lomefloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated acute pyelonephritis.一项关于洛美沙星与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗非复杂性急性肾盂肾炎的多中心研究。
Am J Med. 1992 Apr 6;92(4A):87S-90S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90316-4.
4
Efficacy of lomefloxacin as compared to norfloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in adults.洛美沙星与诺氟沙星治疗成人单纯性尿路感染的疗效比较。
Am J Med. 1992 Apr 6;92(4A):75S-81S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90314-2.
5
Treatment of complicated urinary tract infections with lomefloxacin compared with that with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.洛美沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jun;38(6):1368-73. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.6.1368.
6
A comparison of the safety and efficacy of lomefloxacin and ciprofloxacin in the treatment of complicated or recurrent urinary tract infections.洛美沙星与环丙沙星治疗复杂性或复发性尿路感染的安全性及疗效比较。
Am J Med. 1992 Apr 6;92(4A):82S-86S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90315-3.
7
Comparative, double-blind, prospective, multicenter trial of temafloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.女性单纯性尿路感染中替马沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑对比的双盲前瞻性多中心试验。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Sep;35(9):1777-81. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.9.1777.
8
Efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin oral suspension versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole oral suspension for treatment of older women with acute urinary tract infection.环丙沙星口服混悬液与复方磺胺甲恶唑口服混悬液治疗老年女性急性尿路感染的疗效及安全性比较
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Dec;49(12):1606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.t01-1-49268.x.
9
Ofloxacin versus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection.氧氟沙星与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗单纯性尿路感染的比较。
Clin Ther. 1992 May-Jun;14(3):446-57.
10
Lomefloxacin versus norfloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections: three-day versus seven-day treatment. The South Swedish Lolex Study Group.洛美沙星与诺氟沙星治疗单纯性尿路感染:三日疗法与七日疗法。瑞典南部洛美沙星研究小组。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1992;24(6):773-80. doi: 10.3109/00365549209062463.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections with 3 days of lomefloxacin compared with treatment with 3 days of norfloxacin.洛美沙星3天疗法与诺氟沙星3天疗法治疗急性单纯性尿路感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Mar;37(3):574-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.3.574.