• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当存在失访情况时,对连续型结局指标的两种治疗方法之间差异的检验。

A test for the difference between two treatments in a continuous measure of outcome when there are dropouts.

作者信息

Brown M B

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.

出版信息

Control Clin Trials. 1992 Jun;13(3):213-25. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(92)90004-j.

DOI:10.1016/0197-2456(92)90004-j
PMID:1320558
Abstract

Consider a randomized clinical trial that is designed to compare two treatments in which the treatment continues during the entire period of the study. Some subjects may refuse to complete the protocol and will not return for the final evaluation. Since the reason for dropping out may be related to the subject's self-assessed evaluation of the usefulness of the treatment or to undesirable side effects of the treatment, subjects who drop out cannot be treated as a random sample of those who entered the trial. We consider the situation where the measure of efficacy of the treatment is continuous. Under the assumption that the expected value of the measure for those who drop out is not better (the direction depends on the measure) than that for those who complete the study, we propose an adjustment to the usual test for a difference between treatments that allows for the inclusion of the probable effect of the dropouts; this provides a bound on the test for efficacy of the treatment. First, we estimate a predetermined percentile, such as the median score, of the control, or placebo, group and assign this score to all those who dropped out from both groups and to all subjects in both groups with scores that are worse than the assigned score. A Mann-Whitney statistic is then used to test the equality of the distributions of the two groups. We show by simulation that this modified test is equivalent to a test using the complete data and has greater power than that obtained when including the dropouts by assigning the worst observed score to them. This test will be less sensitive to bias that is induced by exclusion of dropouts from the final evaluation.

摘要

考虑一项随机临床试验,其旨在比较两种治疗方法,且治疗在整个研究期间持续进行。一些受试者可能拒绝完成方案,且不会返回进行最终评估。由于退出的原因可能与受试者对治疗有效性的自我评估或治疗的不良副作用有关,因此退出的受试者不能被视为进入试验的受试者的随机样本。我们考虑治疗效果度量为连续变量的情况。在退出者的度量期望值不比完成研究的受试者更好(方向取决于度量)这一假设下,我们提出对治疗组间差异的常规检验进行调整,以考虑退出者可能产生的影响;这为治疗效果检验提供了一个界限。首先,我们估计对照组或安慰剂组的一个预定百分位数,比如中位数得分,并将该得分赋予两组中所有退出的受试者以及两组中所有得分比所赋得分差的受试者。然后使用曼 - 惠特尼统计量来检验两组分布的相等性。我们通过模拟表明,这种改进后的检验等同于使用完整数据的检验,并且比将最差观察得分赋予退出者并将其纳入分析时所获得的检验具有更大的功效。该检验对因在最终评估中排除退出者而导致的偏差不太敏感。

相似文献

1
A test for the difference between two treatments in a continuous measure of outcome when there are dropouts.当存在失访情况时,对连续型结局指标的两种治疗方法之间差异的检验。
Control Clin Trials. 1992 Jun;13(3):213-25. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(92)90004-j.
2
A median-based test under informative dropout: the one-sample case.
Control Clin Trials. 1997 Oct;18(5):445-59. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00234-6.
3
Testing for treatment differences with dropouts present in clinical trials--a composite approach.在存在失访情况的临床试验中检验治疗差异——一种综合方法。
Stat Med. 1997 Jun 15;16(11):1225-39. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970615)16:11<1225::aid-sim548>3.0.co;2-y.
4
Power and sample size calculations for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test in the presence of death-censored observations.存在死亡删失观测值时Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验的功效及样本量计算
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 10;34(3):406-31. doi: 10.1002/sim.6355. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
5
Visit-driven endpoints in randomized HIV/AIDS clinical trials: impact of missing data on treatment difference measured on summary statistics.
Stat Med. 1999 Jul 30;18(14):1803-17; discussion 1819. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990730)18:14<1803::aid-sim217>3.0.co;2-q.
6
A systematic survey of the methods literature on the reporting quality and optimal methods of handling participants with missing outcome data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials.对随机对照试验中连续结局缺失结局数据参与者的报告质量及最佳处理方法的方法学文献进行系统综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
7
Impact of missing data due to selective dropouts in cohort studies and clinical trials.队列研究和临床试验中因选择性退出导致的数据缺失的影响。
Epidemiology. 2002 May;13(3):347-55. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200205000-00017.
8
Assessing learning effects and nonrandom dropout in a contraceptive device trial.
J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18(2):382-92. doi: 10.1080/10543400701697232.
9
Sensitivity analysis of progression-free survival with dependent withdrawal.采用依赖删失法对无进展生存期进行敏感性分析。
Stat Med. 2008 Apr 15;27(8):1180-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.3015.
10
Partial imputation approach to analysis of repeated measurements with dependent drop-outs.用于分析存在相依性失访的重复测量数据的部分插补方法。
Stat Med. 2001 Apr 30;20(8):1197-214. doi: 10.1002/sim.778.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the power of clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis by using data on continuous scales when analysing response rates: an application of the augmented binary method.在分析缓解率时使用连续量表数据提高类风湿性关节炎临床试验效能:增强二元法的应用
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Oct;55(10):1796-802. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew263. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
2
Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.经阴道手术入路与围手术期行为疗法治疗阴道顶端脱垂的比较:OPTIMAL 随机试验。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1023-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1719.
3
Operations and pelvic muscle training in the management of apical support loss (OPTIMAL) trial: design and methods.
apical 支持丧失(OPTIMAL)试验中的手术和骨盆肌肉训练:设计和方法。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Mar;30(2):178-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.12.001. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
4
How to assess the rate of progression of chronic renal failure in children?
Pediatr Nephrol. 1994 Aug;8(4):499-504. doi: 10.1007/BF00856550.