Goodwin M A, Brown J, Smeltzer M A, Girshick T, Miller S L, Dickson T G
Georgia Poultry Laboratory, Oakwood 30566.
Avian Dis. 1992 Apr-Jun;36(2):356-8.
Antibody titers for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV), infectious bronchitis virus, Newcastle disease virus, and reovirus from chicks with chicken anemia agent (CAA) antibodies were compared with antibody titers from their CAA-antibody-negative counterparts. These comparisons were made in 396 chickens that were 1 day, 2 weeks, 8-9 weeks, 10 weeks, 17 weeks, or 29-32 weeks old. Only one serum sample was collected from any given chick or chicken. There were no significant differences between the antibody titers at any age for any antigen, with one exception: at 29-32 weeks, the IBDV titers were higher (t = 2.62, df = 142, P less than 0.01) in chickens with CAA antibody. Although not at all likely, we believe that the observation of high IBDV antibody titers in CAA-antibody-positive chicks could have been a spurious one.
将携带鸡贫血因子(CAA)抗体的雏鸡针对传染性法氏囊病病毒(IBDV)、传染性支气管炎病毒、新城疫病毒和呼肠孤病毒的抗体效价,与其CAA抗体阴性的对应雏鸡的抗体效价进行了比较。这些比较在396只1日龄、2周龄、8 - 9周龄、10周龄、17周龄或29 - 32周龄的鸡中进行。每只雏鸡或鸡仅采集一份血清样本。对于任何抗原,各年龄组的抗体效价之间均无显著差异,但有一个例外:在29 - 32周龄时,CAA抗体阳性鸡的IBDV效价更高(t = 2.62,自由度 = 142,P < 0.01)。尽管可能性极小,但我们认为在CAA抗体阳性雏鸡中观察到高IBDV抗体效价可能是一种假象。