Suppr超能文献

对新型自行车测力计运动的生理和感知反应。

Physiologic and perceptual responses to exercise on a new cycle ergometer.

作者信息

Attaway R, Bartoli W P, Pate R R, Davis J M

机构信息

Dept. of Exercise Science, School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208.

出版信息

Can J Sport Sci. 1992 Mar;17(1):56-9.

PMID:1322770
Abstract

This study observed oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) during both maximal and submaximal exercise tests on a conventional Monark cycle ergometer and a new Velodyne ergometer. The Velodyne uses the subject's own bicycle attached to an electrically braked roller, which regulates power output. Trained male cyclists performed maximal exercise tests on both ergometers (N = 7) and two submaximal tests on each of three identical Velodynes and a Monark (N = 6). VO2, HR and RPE were measured during the submaximal and maximal tests. Data were analyzed via multiple repeated-measures ANOVA. No differences were found across cycles during the maximal or submaximal tests. The results indicate that the Monark and the Velodyne ergometers elicited similar physiologic and perceptual responses and that the Velodyne can be a viable alternative to the conventional Monark ergometer.

摘要

本研究观察了在传统莫纳克(Monark)功率自行车和新型伟力得(Velodyne)功率自行车上进行最大运动测试和次最大运动测试期间的耗氧量(VO2)、心率(HR)和主观用力程度分级(RPE)。伟力得功率自行车使用受试者自己的自行车连接到电动制动滚筒上,该滚筒可调节功率输出。训练有素的男性自行车运动员在两种功率自行车上进行了最大运动测试(N = 7),并在三台相同的伟力得功率自行车和一台莫纳克功率自行车上各进行了两次次最大运动测试(N = 6)。在次最大运动测试和最大运动测试期间测量了VO2、HR和RPE。通过多重重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析。在最大运动测试或次最大运动测试期间,不同自行车之间未发现差异。结果表明,莫纳克功率自行车和伟力得功率自行车引发了相似的生理和感知反应,并且伟力得功率自行车可以成为传统莫纳克功率自行车的可行替代品。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验