UCT/MRC Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Sports Science Institute of South Africa, University of Cape Town, PO Box 115, Boundary Road, Newlands, Cape Town 7725, South Africa.
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;46(1):42-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090337. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
It has been argued that the physical sensations induced by exercise, measured as the ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), are distinct from the sense of effort. This study aimed to determine whether a new measure of task effort - the Task Effort and Awareness (TEA) score - is able to measure sensations distinct from those included in the conventional RPE scale. Seven well-trained cyclists completed a maximal effort 100 km time trial (TT) and a submaximal trial at 70% of the power sustained during the TT (70% TT). Five maximal 1 km sprints were included in both trials. Both the RPE related solely to physical sensation (P-RPE) and the TEA score increased during the TT and were linearly related. During the 70% TT, both P-RPE and TEA scores increased, but TEA increased significantly less than P-RPE (p<0.001). TEA scores reached maximal values in all 1 km sprints in both the maximal TT and 70% TT, whereas the RPE increased progressively, reaching a maximal value only in the final 1 km sprints in both the TT and the 70% TT. These results indicate that the physical sensations of effort measured as the P-RPE act as the template regulating performance during exercise and that deviation from that template produces an increase in the sense of effort measured by the TEA score. Together, these controls ensure that the chosen exercise intensity does not threaten bodily homeostasis. Our findings also explain why submaximal exercise conducted within the constraints of the template P-RPE does not produce any conscious awareness of effort.
有人认为,运动引起的身体感觉(以感知用力程度评分[RPE]衡量)与用力感不同。本研究旨在确定新的任务用力测量指标——任务用力与意识评分[TEA]是否能够测量与传统 RPE 量表中包含的感觉不同的感觉。7 名训练有素的自行车手完成了最大努力的 100 公里计时赛(TT)和 70% TT 功率维持的亚最大试验(70% TT)。两次试验中均包含 5 次最大 1 公里冲刺。仅与身体感觉相关的 RPE(P-RPE)和 TEA 评分在 TT 期间均增加,且呈线性相关。在 70% TT 期间,P-RPE 和 TEA 评分均增加,但 TEA 增加明显少于 P-RPE(p<0.001)。TEA 评分在最大 TT 和 70% TT 的所有 1 公里冲刺中均达到最大值,而 RPE 则逐渐增加,仅在 TT 和 70% TT 的最后 1 公里冲刺中达到最大值。这些结果表明,作为 P-RPE 测量的用力的身体感觉作为模板调节运动期间的表现,而偏离该模板会导致 TEA 评分测量的用力感增加。这些控制因素共同确保所选的运动强度不会威胁身体的内稳态。我们的研究结果还解释了为什么在模板 P-RPE 限制范围内进行的亚最大运动不会产生任何用力意识。