Meara J R, Wood J L, Wilson M A, Hart M C
Department of Public Health Medicine, Northampton Health Authority.
J Public Health Med. 1992 Jun;14(2):145-50.
The timeliness and adequacy of inpatient discharge communication between hospitals and general practitioners (GPs) in Northamptonshire was examined by a postal questionnaire survey of GPs of patients recently discharged from hospital, with the aim of improving the co-ordination of discharge procedures, and hence improving continuity of care. The questionnaire measured when and how the GP was informed of the discharge, and examined the adequacy of medical, therapeutic and social details in the discharge documents sent out by the hospital. It was found that 67 per cent of discharges had been notified to the GP by the hospital within five days of discharge. With notable exceptions the discharge documents were considered timely. General practitioners were less satisfied with the adequacy of discharge communication in terms of 'social' topics such as transport needs, social services back-up, and whether a patient with a malignancy knew about his or her diagnosis. The GPs of patients under geriatricians were more satisfied with the quality of discharge documents. Comparison with an earlier study suggested that the speed of communication and involvement of GPs in discharge in Northamptonshire is not as satisfactory as that found in Oxford in 1986. It was concluded that within the county there appear to be models of good practice in terms of discharge communication with GPs. These standards should be adopted by other specialties to match or improve on existing good practice.
通过对近期出院患者的全科医生进行邮政问卷调查,研究了北安普敦郡医院与全科医生(GP)之间住院患者出院沟通的及时性和充分性,目的是改善出院程序的协调,从而提高护理的连续性。该问卷衡量了全科医生何时以及如何得知患者出院的消息,并检查了医院发送的出院文件中医疗、治疗和社会细节的充分性。结果发现,67%的出院患者在出院后五天内已由医院通知了全科医生。除了明显的例外情况,出院文件被认为是及时的。全科医生对出院沟通在诸如交通需求、社会服务支持以及恶性肿瘤患者是否知晓其诊断等“社会”话题方面的充分性不太满意。老年病科患者的全科医生对出院文件的质量更满意。与早期研究相比,北安普敦郡全科医生在出院沟通的速度和参与度方面不如1986年在牛津发现的那样令人满意。得出的结论是,在该郡内,在与全科医生的出院沟通方面似乎存在良好做法的模式。其他专科应采用这些标准以匹配或改进现有的良好做法。