Palmer T M, Jacobson K A, Stiles G L
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Mol Pharmacol. 1992 Sep;42(3):391-7.
Two antipeptide antibody preparations were raised against deduced amino acid sequences within the presumed second extra-cellular loop (antibody TP/1) and the carboxyl-terminal domain (antibody TP/2) of the canine-derived A2 adenosine receptor (A2AR) cDNA species termed RDC8. Immunoblotting of canine liver plasma membranes with both TP/1 and TP/2 identified a single band of 52 kDa, which co-migrated with 125I-2-[4-[2-[2-[(4- azidophenyl)methylcarbonylamino]ethylaminocarbonyl]ethyl] phenyl]ethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine-labeled receptor. However, in membranes prepared from canine striatum, photoaffinity labeling and immunoblotting with TP/2, but not TP/1, revealed a single band of 34 kDa; the identity of the band observed on the immunoblot as an A2AR was confirmed by the ability of TP/2 to specifically immunoprecipitate photoaffinity-labeled receptor from crude canine striatal membranes. The size difference between liver and striatal A2ARs was not due to tissue-specific proteolysis, because membranes from striatum were prepared with a protease inhibitor cocktail previously shown to be effective in inhibiting endogenous A2AR proteolysis during membrane preparation. Also, the protease-sensitive carboxyl-terminal region of the receptor had remained intact, because the peptide used to raise TP/2 antibodies resides in this domain of the molecule. The difference in size was also not due to a greater carbohydrate content of the liver receptor, because treatment of liver and striatal membranes with endoglycosidase F produced small mobility shifts for both receptors. Removal of N-linked carbohydrate chains also did not alter the inability of TP/1 to recognize the striatal A2AR. Hence, we conclude that the A2AR present in liver, which displays the predicted immunoreactivity of RDC8, is immunologically distinct from the A2AR expressed in striatum and that the latter may represent an additional A2AR subtype.
针对犬源A2腺苷受体(A2AR)cDNA物种RDC8推测的第二个细胞外环(抗体TP/1)和羧基末端结构域(抗体TP/2)内的推导氨基酸序列,制备了两种抗肽抗体制剂。用TP/1和TP/2对犬肝细胞膜进行免疫印迹,鉴定出一条52 kDa的单一条带,它与125I-2-[4-[2-[2-[(4-叠氮苯基)甲基羰基氨基]乙基氨基羰基]乙基]苯基]乙氨基-5'-N-乙基羧酰胺腺苷标记的受体共迁移。然而,在犬纹状体制备的膜中,用TP/2进行光亲和标记和免疫印迹(而非TP/1)显示出一条34 kDa的单一条带;TP/2能够从犬纹状体粗膜中特异性免疫沉淀光亲和标记的受体,从而证实了免疫印迹上观察到的条带为A2AR。肝和纹状体A2AR之间的大小差异并非由于组织特异性蛋白水解,因为纹状体膜是用先前已证明在膜制备过程中能有效抑制内源性A2AR蛋白水解的蛋白酶抑制剂混合物制备的。此外,受体的蛋白酶敏感羧基末端区域保持完整,因为用于制备TP/2抗体的肽位于该分子的此结构域中。大小差异也不是由于肝受体的碳水化合物含量更高,因为用内切糖苷酶F处理肝和纹状体膜后,两种受体的迁移率都有小的变化。去除N-连接的碳水化合物链也没有改变TP/1无法识别纹状体A2AR的情况。因此,我们得出结论,肝脏中存在的A2AR显示出RDC8预测的免疫反应性,在免疫上与纹状体中表达的A2AR不同,后者可能代表另一种A2AR亚型。