Davis P A, Leung P, Manns M, Kaplan M, Munoz S J, Gorin F A, Dickson E R, Krawitt E, Coppel R, Gershwin M E
University of California, Davis 95616.
Hepatology. 1992 Nov;16(5):1128-36.
Before the identification of the major mitochondrial antigens of primary biliary cirrhosis as components of the 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase enzyme family, mitochondrial autoantigens were believed to be extremely heterogeneous and were divided into nine subtypes termed M1 to M9. This classification was based on the data derived from the relatively nonspecific biochemical and immunological techniques that were available. After the cloning and definition of the major autoantigens, more than 95% of the sera of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis were found to react with components of the 2-oxo-dehydrogenase enzymes; these enzymes correspond to the old M2 classification. Two other "M" species, dubbed M4 and M9, have attracted significant attention because they have been postulated to be prognostic indicators and more recently have been tentatively identified respectively as sulfite oxidase (EC 1.8.3.1) and glycogen phosphorylase (EC 2.4.1.1). Indeed, patients with the "overlap syndrome" are reported to have antibodies to M4 and a poor prognosis, whereas patients with antibodies to M9 have a favorable prognosis. To address the significance and definition of M4 and M9, we performed in-depth studies of sera from 11 patients with the overlap syndrome, 75 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, 19 chronic active hepatitis patients, 13 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, 10 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, 20 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, 20 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, 17 patients with scleroderma and 30 normal individuals, using techniques of ELISA, complement fixation, immunoblotting and enzyme inhibition. We report herein that we were unable to show any disease-specific reactivity toward the proposed M4 and M9 antigens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在原发性胆汁性肝硬化的主要线粒体抗原被鉴定为2-氧代酸脱氢酶家族的组成成分之前,线粒体自身抗原被认为具有极大的异质性,并被分为9个亚型,称为M1至M9。这种分类是基于当时可用的相对非特异性的生化和免疫技术所获得的数据。在主要自身抗原被克隆和定义之后,发现超过95%的原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者血清与2-氧代脱氢酶的成分发生反应;这些酶对应于旧的M2分类。另外两种“M”类型,即M4和M9,引起了极大关注,因为它们被假定为预后指标,最近分别被初步鉴定为亚硫酸盐氧化酶(EC 1.8.3.1)和糖原磷酸化酶(EC 2.4.1.1)。确实,据报道患有“重叠综合征”的患者有针对M4的抗体且预后不良,而有针对M9抗体的患者预后良好。为了探讨M4和M9的意义及定义,我们使用酶联免疫吸附测定、补体结合、免疫印迹和酶抑制技术,对11例重叠综合征患者、�5例原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者、19例慢性活动性肝炎患者、13例原发性硬化性胆管炎患者、10例胆管癌患者、20例系统性红斑狼疮患者、20例酒精性肝硬化患者、17例硬皮病患者和30名正常人的血清进行了深入研究。我们在此报告,我们未能显示出对所提出的M4和M9抗原的任何疾病特异性反应。(摘要截短于250词)