Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;13(10):599-605.
A Surgical Wound Infection (SWI) Task Force was convened by The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America (SHEA) to evaluate how SWI surveillance should be done and to identify where more information is needed. The Task Force reached consensus in the following areas. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definitions of SWI should be used for routine surveillance because of their current widespread acceptance and reproducibility. The CDC definitions have been clarified in an accompanying article ("Report From the CDC"). Direct observation of wounds and traditional infection control surveillance techniques are acceptable methods of case finding for hospitalized patients. The optimal method for case finding postdischarge or after outpatient surgery is unknown at this time. SWI rates should be stratified by surgical wound class plus a measure of patient susceptibility to infection, such as the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, and duration of surgery. Surgeon-specific SWI rates should be calculated and reported to individual surgeons.
美国医院流行病学学会(SHEA)召集了一个手术伤口感染(SWI)特别工作组,以评估应如何进行SWI监测,并确定哪些方面需要更多信息。特别工作组在以下领域达成了共识。由于疾病控制中心(CDC)对SWI的定义目前已被广泛接受且具有可重复性,因此应将其用于常规监测。CDC的定义在随附文章(“来自CDC的报告”)中已得到澄清。对伤口进行直接观察以及采用传统的感染控制监测技术是发现住院患者病例的可接受方法。目前尚不清楚出院后或门诊手术后发现病例的最佳方法。SWI发生率应按手术伤口类别以及患者对感染的易感性指标(如美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级)和手术持续时间进行分层。应计算特定外科医生的SWI发生率并报告给各个外科医生。