• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家医疗保健系统中的公平性与可行性。

Fairness and feasibility in national health care systems.

作者信息

Pauly M V

机构信息

Wharton School, Philadelphia.

出版信息

Health Econ. 1992 Jul;1(2):93-103. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730010203.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4730010203
PMID:1341932
Abstract

The issue of National Health Care reform has been discussed from many different perspectives. One of the most fundamental justifications for such reform is based on the notion of horizontal equity. The motivation for equity in medical services use contrasts with the seeming lack of concern for equity in financing. Proposed policy remedies often involve transfers through taxation, though the effects of government taxation often reduce the efficiency of publicly financed health insurance. Further, the effects of heterogeneous preferences complicate the assessment of optimal medical service consumption levels. Ethical justification aside, this paper addresses the notion of fairness in the provision of medical care from an economic perspective. It suggests policies which might be most suitable in achieving such a goal. A paradoxical result of these considerations of fairness is that unequal insurance coverage is requisite to ensure more equal utilization of medical services by the population. The concept of fairness is then developed into a bottom up system of equity in the medical market.

摘要

全民医保改革问题已从诸多不同角度进行了探讨。此类改革最根本的正当理由之一基于横向公平的理念。医疗服务使用方面追求公平的动机与筹资方面看似缺乏对公平的关注形成对比。提议的政策补救措施通常涉及通过税收进行转移支付,尽管政府征税的影响往往会降低公共筹资医疗保险的效率。此外,偏好异质性的影响使对最优医疗服务消费水平的评估变得复杂。撇开伦理正当理由不谈,本文从经济角度探讨了医疗服务提供中的公平概念。它提出了可能最适合实现这一目标的政策。这些公平考量的一个矛盾结果是,不平等的保险覆盖对于确保民众更平等地利用医疗服务是必要的。公平概念随后被发展成医疗市场中一种自下而上的公平体系。

相似文献

1
Fairness and feasibility in national health care systems.国家医疗保健系统中的公平性与可行性。
Health Econ. 1992 Jul;1(2):93-103. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730010203.
2
Access, cost, and financing: achieving an ethical health reform.可及性、费用和融资:实现合乎伦理的卫生改革。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):w909-16. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.w909. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
3
Universal access to health care: a practical perspective.全民医疗保健:实践视角
J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1993 Summer;16(1):6-34.
4
Equity, governance and financing after health care reform: lessons from Mexico.医疗改革后的公平性、治理与融资:来自墨西哥的经验教训
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2008 Jan-Mar;23(1):37-49. doi: 10.1002/hpm.913.
5
Benchmarks of fairness: a moral framework for assessing equity.公平的基准:评估公平性的道德框架。
Int J Health Serv. 1999;29(4):853-69. doi: 10.2190/DBBU-WUC4-Y23L-4LEA.
6
Why single payer is still our best bet.为何单一支付体系仍是我们的最佳选择。
Soc Policy. 1994 Spring;24(3):24-31.
7
The Clinton health care reform proposal: efficiency, fairness, and the role of government.克林顿医疗保健改革提案:效率、公平与政府的作用。
Health Care Manag. 1994 Aug;1(1):1-22.
8
Comment on "Medicare financing reform: a new Medicare premium".关于《医疗保险融资改革:新的医疗保险保费》的评论
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1984 Spring;62(2):317-24.
9
Do we really want broad access to health care?我们真的希望医疗保健能够广泛普及吗?
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 24;352(12):1260-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb043863.
10
Reforming health care financing in Bulgaria: the population perspective.保加利亚医疗保健融资改革:民众视角
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Feb;58(4):753-65. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00241-7.