Pauly M V
Wharton School, Philadelphia.
Health Econ. 1992 Jul;1(2):93-103. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730010203.
The issue of National Health Care reform has been discussed from many different perspectives. One of the most fundamental justifications for such reform is based on the notion of horizontal equity. The motivation for equity in medical services use contrasts with the seeming lack of concern for equity in financing. Proposed policy remedies often involve transfers through taxation, though the effects of government taxation often reduce the efficiency of publicly financed health insurance. Further, the effects of heterogeneous preferences complicate the assessment of optimal medical service consumption levels. Ethical justification aside, this paper addresses the notion of fairness in the provision of medical care from an economic perspective. It suggests policies which might be most suitable in achieving such a goal. A paradoxical result of these considerations of fairness is that unequal insurance coverage is requisite to ensure more equal utilization of medical services by the population. The concept of fairness is then developed into a bottom up system of equity in the medical market.
全民医保改革问题已从诸多不同角度进行了探讨。此类改革最根本的正当理由之一基于横向公平的理念。医疗服务使用方面追求公平的动机与筹资方面看似缺乏对公平的关注形成对比。提议的政策补救措施通常涉及通过税收进行转移支付,尽管政府征税的影响往往会降低公共筹资医疗保险的效率。此外,偏好异质性的影响使对最优医疗服务消费水平的评估变得复杂。撇开伦理正当理由不谈,本文从经济角度探讨了医疗服务提供中的公平概念。它提出了可能最适合实现这一目标的政策。这些公平考量的一个矛盾结果是,不平等的保险覆盖对于确保民众更平等地利用医疗服务是必要的。公平概念随后被发展成医疗市场中一种自下而上的公平体系。