Chandra R, Srivastava V K, Nirupam S
Upgraded Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, King George's Medical College, Lucknow, India.
Asia Pac J Public Health. 1992;6(3):153-5. doi: 10.1177/101053959200600307.
The Urban Basic Services (UBS) programme was launched in some of the urban slums in the major cities of India in the year 1986. The main objective of the Urban Basic Services (UBS) Program is to improve and upgrade the quality of life of the urban poor, particularly the women and children. The major thrust area under the UBS programme includes child survival and development, learning opportunities for women and children, water and sanitation, and community organization. The present study attempts to find out the impact of the UBS Program in terms of the immunization coverage carried out in slums covered by UBS and comparing it with non-UBS slums using the 30-cluster sampling technique as suggested by WHO. The percentage of fully immunized children was higher (16.2%) in the UBS slums compared to 10.9% in non-UBS slums. The immunization coverage of children was slightly better in the UBS slums for BCG, DPT and Oral Polio Vaccines, while for measles it was 18.6% in UBS slums and 11.9% in non-UBS slums. The dropout rates for I to III doses of DPT was much higher (36.4%) in non-UBS slums as compared to 28% in UBS slums. The availability of immunization cards was found to be higher in both mothers (16.7%) and children (22.4%) in UBS slums compared to the non-UBS ones (5.2% and 8.6% respectively). The slums thus covered under the UBS program have done marginally better in immunization but it appears that to assess the overall impact of UBS, all the components of services and not merely immunization should be assessed.
城市基本服务(UBS)项目于1986年在印度主要城市的一些城市贫民窟启动。城市基本服务(UBS)项目的主要目标是改善和提升城市贫困人口,尤其是妇女和儿童的生活质量。UBS项目的主要重点领域包括儿童生存与发展、妇女和儿童的学习机会、水与卫生设施以及社区组织。本研究试图根据UBS覆盖的贫民窟中开展的免疫接种覆盖率,采用世界卫生组织建议的30群抽样技术,找出UBS项目的影响,并将其与非UBS贫民窟进行比较。UBS贫民窟中完全免疫儿童的百分比更高(16.2%),而非UBS贫民窟为10.9%。UBS贫民窟中儿童接种卡介苗、百白破疫苗和口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗的免疫覆盖率略高,而麻疹疫苗接种率在UBS贫民窟为18.6%,非UBS贫民窟为11.9%。非UBS贫民窟中百白破疫苗第一至三剂的接种率(36.4%)比UBS贫民窟(28%)高得多。与非UBS贫民窟(分别为5.2%和8.6%)相比,UBS贫民窟中母亲(16.7%)和儿童(22.4%)的免疫接种卡持有率更高。因此,UBS项目覆盖的贫民窟在免疫接种方面略好一些,但似乎要评估UBS的总体影响,应该评估服务的所有组成部分,而不仅仅是免疫接种。