Suppr超能文献

5-甲氧基补骨脂素在银屑病治疗中应用的重新评估。

A reappraisal of the use of 5-methoxypsoralen in the therapy of psoriasis.

作者信息

Calzavara-Pinton P, Ortel B, Carlino A, Honigsmann H, De Panfilis G

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Brescia University Hospital, Italy.

出版信息

Exp Dermatol. 1992 Jul;1(1):46-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.1992.tb00071.x.

Abstract

5-methoxypsoralen (5-MOP) is considered an alternative to 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) for photochemotherapy of psoriasis. We have compared the clinical efficacy and tolerability of 5-MOP (1.2 mg/kg)-UVA versus 8-MOP (0.6 mg/kg)-UVA therapy in 25 patients of skin type III and IV, affected by relapsing plaque-type psoriasis of similar body involvement; indeed, the same patients were given 8-MOP during 1 year and 5-MOP during the subsequent year after relapsing. Both treatments cleared psoriatic lesions with a comparable number of exposures, but 5-MOP required significantly higher cumulative UVA doses. The difference was due to the lower phototoxicity of 5-MOP, as assessed by the determination of the minimal phototoxic dose, and to its higher tanning activity, as assessed by the weekly grading of pigmentation. Nevertheless, therapy by 5-MOP-UVA seemed particularly interesting in that it showed a higher tolerability since only 1 patient experienced nausea, whereas during therapy with 8-MOP-UVA nausea and/or vomiting occurred in 7 patients, sunburn in 6 and itching in 3. Since we have treated the same patients with the two drugs, our results were not influenced by interindividual variations of phototoxic responses, tanning ability and susceptibility to develop psoralen-induced short-term side-effects. It was concluded that, although long-term side-effects of the 5-MOP-UVA treatment have still to be determined, such treatment of psoriasis should be reappraised due to its higher tolerability in comparison to 8-MOP-UVA treatment.

摘要

5-甲氧基补骨脂素(5-MOP)被认为是8-甲氧基补骨脂素(8-MOP)用于银屑病光化学疗法的替代药物。我们比较了25例皮肤类型为III型和IV型、患有全身受累程度相似的复发性斑块型银屑病患者接受5-MOP(1.2mg/kg)-UVA疗法与8-MOP(0.6mg/kg)-UVA疗法的临床疗效和耐受性;实际上,这些患者在复发后的1年接受8-MOP治疗,随后1年接受5-MOP治疗。两种治疗方法清除银屑病皮损所需的照射次数相当,但5-MOP所需的累积UVA剂量明显更高。这种差异是由于5-MOP的光毒性较低(通过测定最小光毒性剂量评估)及其晒黑活性较高(通过每周色素沉着分级评估)。然而,5-MOP-UVA疗法似乎特别有意义,因为它显示出更高的耐受性,只有1例患者出现恶心,而在8-MOP-UVA治疗期间,7例患者出现恶心和/或呕吐,6例出现晒伤,3例出现瘙痒。由于我们用两种药物治疗了相同的患者,我们的结果不受光毒性反应、晒黑能力和发生补骨脂素诱导的短期副作用易感性的个体差异影响。得出的结论是,尽管5-MOP-UVA治疗的长期副作用仍有待确定,但与8-MOP-UVA治疗相比,由于其更高的耐受性,银屑病的这种治疗方法应重新评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验