Kelly H W, Murphy S
College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131.
Ann Pharmacother. 1992 Jan;26(1):81-91. doi: 10.1177/106002809202600115.
To critically review the use of beta-adrenergic agonists in acute, severe asthma with particular focus on aerosol administration.
English language articles published since 1971 on the use of beta-agonists for acute asthma. Studies were identified from bibliographies of book chapters, review articles, and other research articles.
All studies (21 total) comparing systemic with inhaled beta-agonists were reviewed, regardless of their design or outcome. Selected studies highlighting specific aspects of beta-agonist use in acute asthma such as beta-agonists versus other bronchodilators, aerosol delivery, and intravenous beta-agonists were also reviewed.
Performed subjectively by the authors with specific aspects of quality discussed within the body of the article.
The beta-agonists provide superior bronchodilation in acute severe asthma compared with either the methylxanthines and/or anticholinergics. The majority of studies found aerosolized beta-agonists to be either as effective as or more effective than parenteral beta-agonists and to produce fewer adverse cardiovascular effects. Studies showing preference for parenteral therapy have either been of poor design or used low doses of an aerosolized beta-agonist. Based on studies of aerosol delivery, there is no advantage of jet nebulization over metered-dose inhalers; however, other aspects, including ease of administration, favor nebulization as the delivery method of choice. The articles recommending intravenous beta-agonists consist of a series of uncontrolled cases.
Aerosolized selective beta 2-agonists are the bronchodilator treatments of choice for acute, severe asthma. Attention to the details of dosing and delivery are required for optimal results. The final dose and dosing interval are determined by the patient's response. Intravenous beta-agonists are hazardous and cannot be recommended.
批判性地综述β-肾上腺素能激动剂在急性重度哮喘中的应用,尤其关注雾化吸入给药。
1971年以来发表的关于β-激动剂用于急性哮喘的英文文章。通过书籍章节、综述文章及其他研究文章的参考文献确定研究。
对所有比较全身用与吸入用β-激动剂的研究(共21项)进行综述,无论其设计或结果如何。还对突出β-激动剂在急性哮喘中使用的特定方面(如β-激动剂与其他支气管扩张剂对比、雾化给药及静脉用β-激动剂)的选定研究进行了综述。
由作者主观进行,并在文章正文中讨论质量的具体方面。
与甲基黄嘌呤类和/或抗胆碱能药物相比,β-激动剂在急性重度哮喘中能提供更优的支气管扩张作用。大多数研究发现雾化吸入β-激动剂与胃肠外给予β-激动剂效果相当或更有效,且产生的心血管不良反应更少。显示胃肠外治疗更优的研究设计不佳或使用了低剂量的雾化吸入β-激动剂。基于雾化给药的研究,喷射雾化器并不优于定量吸入器;然而,包括给药便利性在内的其他方面使雾化成为首选的给药方法。推荐静脉用β-激动剂的文章均为一系列非对照病例。
雾化吸入选择性β2-激动剂是急性重度哮喘的首选支气管扩张剂治疗。为获得最佳效果,需要关注给药剂量和给药方式的细节。最终剂量和给药间隔由患者的反应决定。静脉用β-激动剂有风险,不推荐使用。