Kamada A K
Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Center for Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Denver, CO 80206.
Ann Pharmacother. 1994 Jul-Aug;28(7-8):904-14. doi: 10.1177/106002809402800716.
To introduce readers to the current controversial topics in the area of asthma therapy. Background is provided such that clinicians are aware of these issues and can make rational decisions.
Pertinent articles were individually identified and reviewed from each journal.
Relevant studies, determined by topic and other specific criteria, e.g., testing methodology, were included.
Further investigation is required in the areas discussed. Systemic effects, specifically growth suppression (in children), adrenal suppression, and osteoporosis, have been demonstrated with high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids; however, the clinical relevance of such intravenous glucocorticoid formulations via nebulizer have not been demonstrated. Likewise, data on the equivalence of the inhaled glucocorticoids, with regard to efficacy and potential systemic effects, and the differences between metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers, with regard to aerosol characteristics and drug delivery, are unclear. Theophylline, when used with inhaled beta-adrenergic agonists and systemic glucocorticoids for the treatment of acute asthma, as not been shown to provide clear benefit and may result in increased adverse effects. The use of regular (vs. "as needed" or prn) inhaled beta-adrenergic agonists, although shown in two studies to be detrimental to the control of asthma and result in an increased risk of death or near death caused by asthma, has not been conclusively demonstrated to be harmful.
Monitoring for adverse effects and the use of techniques to minimize systemic absorption (spacers and mouth rinsing) are recommended when high-dose inhaled glucocorticoid therapy is used. Intranasal and intravenous glucocorticoid products are not recommended for administration via nebulizer because of safety concerns. Until further data are available, inhaled glucocorticoids are thought to be equivalent on a microgram-per-microgram basis rather than an actuation-per-actuation basis. Theophylline is no longer recommended for treatment of acute exacerbations in nonhospitalized patients not already receiving the medication, and the link between deterioration of asthma control (and the risk for death) and regular inhaled beta-adrenergic agonists appears weak.
向读者介绍哮喘治疗领域当前存在争议的话题。提供相关背景知识,以便临床医生了解这些问题并做出合理决策。
从各期刊中分别识别并审阅相关文章。
纳入根据主题和其他特定标准(如测试方法)确定的相关研究。
在所讨论的领域需要进一步研究。高剂量吸入糖皮质激素已被证明会产生全身效应,特别是生长抑制(在儿童中)、肾上腺抑制和骨质疏松;然而,通过雾化器使用此类静脉用糖皮质激素制剂的临床相关性尚未得到证实。同样,关于吸入糖皮质激素在疗效和潜在全身效应方面的等效性,以及定量吸入器和干粉吸入器在气雾剂特性和药物递送方面的差异的数据尚不清楚。当茶碱与吸入β-肾上腺素能激动剂和全身用糖皮质激素联合用于治疗急性哮喘时,尚未显示出明显益处,且可能导致不良反应增加。定期(相对于“按需”或必要时)使用吸入β-肾上腺素能激动剂,尽管两项研究表明其对哮喘控制有害,并增加哮喘导致死亡或濒死的风险,但尚未确凿证明其有害。
使用高剂量吸入糖皮质激素治疗时,建议监测不良反应并采用尽量减少全身吸收的技术(储物罐和漱口)。出于安全考虑,不建议通过雾化器给予鼻内和静脉用糖皮质激素产品。在获得更多数据之前,吸入糖皮质激素在微克对微克的基础上而非每次喷雾的基础上被认为是等效的。对于尚未接受该药物治疗的非住院患者,不再推荐使用茶碱治疗急性加重,且哮喘控制恶化(以及死亡风险)与定期吸入β-肾上腺素能激动剂之间的联系似乎较弱。