Suppr超能文献

Reference period analysis of vaginal bleeding with triphasic oral contraceptive agents containing norethindrone or levonorgestrel: a comparison study.

作者信息

Schwarz B E, Pierce C, Walden C E, Knopp R H

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

出版信息

Int J Fertil. 1992 May-Jun;37(3):176-82.

PMID:1355765
Abstract

The World Health Organization recommends the use of fixed reference periods for quantification of the incidence and severity of vaginal bleeding when patients use various forms of contraception. Ninety- and 110-day reference periods were used in the analysis of data from daily menstrual diaries kept by 72 healthy women in a one-year study of oral contraceptive agents containing ethinyl estradiol and either norethindrone or levonorgestrel. Analysis of bleeding patterns reported during both 90-day and 110-day periods revealed fewer days of bleeding and/or spotting overall with norethindrone than with levonorgestrel (e.g., a mean of 16.06 vs. 19.55 days, respectively, over the first 90-day period; P = .013) and significantly shorter bleeding and/or spotting episodes with the norethindrone preparation. This trend persisted when data were adjusted for a day-1 pill start. Using either method of analysis, duration of bleeding episodes was shorter among subjects taking norethindrone than levonorgestrel. Pills were missed in both study groups, but more women in the LNG/EE group missed from 1 to 3 pills in at least one cycle (31 vs. 21 in the NET/EE group). The between-group difference in bleeding events may be due to intrinsic hormonal differences in regimens or to the greater number of pills missed among levonorgestrel users.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验