Suppr超能文献

欧洲的基础研究;不同国家倾向于采用不同的体系来支持和组织科研工作。

Basic research in Europe; different countries favor different systems for the support and organization of scientific work.

作者信息

GATES D M

出版信息

Science. 1958 Aug 1;128(3318):227-35. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3318.227.

Abstract

Europe, traditionally the breeding ground for basic scientific research until the 1930's, is only now approaching full recovery from the devastating effects of the war. Great Britain has a more stimulating climate for research, a more progressive graduate-school program, and a more flexible professorship structure than any other country of Europe. Germany still has several years to go before the effects of the war will be obliterated. In most northern European countries, the organization and support of academic research ranges from good to excellent, and a stimulating intellectual atmosphere exists. Germany is rapidly contending for the lead in basic research along with England and Sweden, which are now in the forefront. The Netherlands is typified by superb organization, and most of the Scandinavian countries are high in quality if not always in quantity of research. France is characterized by brilliant individual contributions but over-all falls far short of her potential for scientific research. Switzerland, a highly industrialized country, is geared primarily for engineering and does not compete as highly on basic research as might otherwise be expected. Italian research is good in certain areas but is plagued by a number of difficulties that retard progress. Nevertheless, there are encouraging efforts being made in Italy to develop some good scientific programs. In the south of Europe the situation is generally discouraging and will continue to be so, except where a few dedicated, brilliant individuals are making good contributions with the meager resources available. Europe will continue to be a tremendous scientific manpower reserve for the United States, and, despite accusations of proselyting, the fact remains that in many European countries the employment possibilities are not commensurate with the production rate of scientists and engineers. If the universities of Europe would realign the professional structure of their departmental staffs and extend their graduate curricula they would give far more opportunity to young research scientists and make better use of their facilities. America can indeed be grateful to Europe for a great cultural and academic heritage, and one can sincerely hope that close cooperation in science will take place for many years to come.

摘要

直到20世纪30年代,欧洲一直是传统的基础科学研究发源地,如今才刚刚从战争的毁灭性影响中全面恢复。英国拥有比欧洲其他任何国家都更具激励性的研究氛围、更先进的研究生项目和更灵活的教授职位结构。德国要消除战争影响仍需数年时间。在大多数北欧国家,学术研究的组织和支持从良好到卓越不等,且存在着激励人的学术氛围。德国正迅速与处于前沿的英国和瑞典争夺基础研究的领先地位。荷兰以其卓越的组织为典型,大多数斯堪的纳维亚国家在研究质量上很高,即便在研究数量上并非总是如此。法国以杰出的个人贡献为特点,但总体而言远远没有发挥出其科研潜力。瑞士是一个高度工业化的国家,主要侧重于工程领域,在基础研究方面的竞争力没有预期的那么高。意大利的研究在某些领域不错,但受到一些阻碍进展的困难困扰。尽管如此,意大利正在做出令人鼓舞的努力来开展一些优秀的科学项目。在欧洲南部,总体情况令人沮丧,并且将持续如此,除非有少数敬业、杰出的个人利用有限的资源做出了出色贡献。欧洲将继续是美国巨大的科学人力储备地,而且,尽管存在劝诱的指责,但事实仍然是,在许多欧洲国家,就业机会与科学家和工程师的产出率不相称。如果欧洲的大学能够重新调整其部门工作人员的专业结构并扩展其研究生课程,它们将为年轻的研究科学家提供更多机会,并更好地利用其设施。美国确实应该感激欧洲伟大的文化和学术遗产,人们真诚地希望在未来许多年里科学领域能够开展密切合作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验