Steeg P S
Cancer Treat Res. 1992;61:45-57. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3500-3_3.
It is apparent that multiple genetic events occur in the development and progression of breast cancer. From the limited data available, no consistent temporal pattern of mutational events is required. This conclusion is consistent with data in colorectal carcinoma, where the number of mutational events, and not the order, appears to be relevant. Several authors have questioned whether the multiple mutational events occur independently or whether significant associations were evident. Cropp et al. postulated that two sets of mutational events occurred simultaneously in a higher degree of breast tumors than expected based on chance: Set 1 consisted of deletions on 11p, 17p, 18q, and int-2 and myc amplifications; set 2 consisted of 17q, 1p, and 3p deletions. Sato et al., analyzing another tumor cohort for simultaneous mutations, noted a correlation of 17p and 16q deletions, 13q and 17p deletions, and 17p deletion with erbB-2 amplification. Clearly, concordant data on this issue will require the use of large breast tumor cohorts for a comprehensive set of probes. The reasons why mutations to specific genes on different chromosomes tend to occur coordinately is unknown, but may involve common flanking and/or intron sequences at high risk for certain types of mutational events. Another interesting question is the degree to which alterations, but not homozygous inactivation, of suppressor genes occur and its phenotypic consequences. In this chapter, evidence was presented for the amplification of a DCC allele in breast cancer and for variable RB protein expression in breast tumors as a consequence of allelic deletion. For many of the metastasis suppressor genes, a simple reduction in their expression, or an alteration in their expression over the normal cellular regulatory controls, may be sufficient to fuel the metastatic process. The data suggest a more complex regulation of the cancer phenotype by suppressor genes than by recessive inactivation alone. Why do many sporadic cancers, including breast cancer, appear to require alterations to multiple suppressor genes, as compared to diseases such as retinoblastoma, where a single suppressor gene appears to control the cancer phenotype? The answer to this question is unknown, but most theories are based on the hypothesis that suppressor genes act to control cellular responses to either other cells or signals in the microenvironment. In retinoblastoma all cells can carry a germ-line mutation. Cells carrying the RB mutation can interact with both the embryonic and differentiated microenvironments; the specific interaction of mutated cells with the embryonic retinal microenvironment may trigger the onset of retinoblastoma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
显然,多种基因事件发生在乳腺癌的发生和发展过程中。从现有的有限数据来看,突变事件不需要一致的时间模式。这一结论与结直肠癌的数据一致,在结直肠癌中,突变事件的数量而非顺序似乎具有相关性。几位作者质疑多个突变事件是独立发生的,还是存在明显的显著关联。克罗普等人推测,两组突变事件在乳腺癌肿瘤中同时发生的程度高于基于概率的预期:第一组包括11p、17p、18q的缺失以及int-2和myc的扩增;第二组包括17q、1p和3p的缺失。佐藤等人在分析另一组肿瘤队列的同时突变时,注意到17p和16q缺失、13q和17p缺失以及17p缺失与erbB-2扩增之间存在相关性。显然,关于这个问题的一致数据将需要使用大量乳腺癌肿瘤队列以及一套全面的探针。不同染色体上特定基因发生突变倾向于协同发生的原因尚不清楚,但可能涉及某些类型突变事件高风险的共同侧翼和/或内含子序列。另一个有趣的问题是抑制基因的改变(而非纯合失活)发生的程度及其表型后果。在本章中,有证据表明乳腺癌中存在DCC等位基因的扩增,以及由于等位基因缺失导致乳腺肿瘤中RB蛋白表达的变化。对于许多转移抑制基因来说,其表达的简单降低,或其表达相对于正常细胞调节控制的改变,可能足以推动转移过程。数据表明,抑制基因对癌症表型的调控比单纯的隐性失活更为复杂。为什么与视网膜母细胞瘤等疾病相比,包括乳腺癌在内的许多散发性癌症似乎需要多个抑制基因发生改变,而在视网膜母细胞瘤中,单个抑制基因似乎就能控制癌症表型?这个问题的答案尚不清楚,但大多数理论基于这样的假设,即抑制基因的作用是控制细胞对其他细胞或微环境中信号的反应。在视网膜母细胞瘤中,所有细胞都可能携带种系突变。携带RB突变的细胞可以与胚胎和分化的微环境相互作用;突变细胞与胚胎视网膜微环境的特定相互作用可能触发视网膜母细胞瘤的发生。(摘要截选至400字)