Suppr超能文献

长效β2受体激动剂治疗支气管哮喘。福莫特罗(12μg)每日吸入两次与沙丁胺醇(200μg)每日吸入四次的比较

[Bronchial asthma treated with long-acting beta 2 agonist. Comparison between formoterol (12 mu/g) inhaled twice daily and salbutamol (200 mu/g) inhaled 4 times daily].

作者信息

Sprogøe-Jakobsen U, Viktrup L, Davidsen O, Viskum K

机构信息

Odense Sygehus, lungemedicinsk afdeling L.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1992 Nov 16;154(47):3325-8.

PMID:1361083
Abstract

Forty patients with stable asthma and daily need for inhaled beta 2-agonist, were included in a randomized double-blind study. They were treated for six weeks with inhaled beta 2-agonist, either salbutamol, 4 x 200 micrograms daily, of formoterol, 2 x 12 micrograms and 2 x placebo daily. This was preceded by a run-in period, where all patients received terbutalin-inhalation, 4 x 500 micrograms daily. Twenty patients were given formoterol and 18 salbutamol. One patient in the salbutamol-treated group discontinued treatment after three weeks, because of deterioration of asthma. On a diary card, patients recorded peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) morning and evening before medication, score of asthma symptoms (scale 0-3; 0 = no symptoms, and 3 = severe symptoms) and use of additional doses of beta 2-agonist. Forced expiratory volume in 1 sec. (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and PEFR were obtained after 0, three and six weeks of treatment. Blinded global assessment of the treatment was performed by both patient and physician at the end of the study. During run-in the two groups of patients were different. The group subsequently treated with salbutamol had a statistical significant (ss) higher morning-PEFR, ss fewer asthma-symptom scores than one during night and ss less need for additional puffs of beta 2-agonist. During treatment, the formoterol-treated group showed an ss increase in morning-PEFR, as compared to run-in. Furthermore this group had ss fewer nocturnal symptom scores than one and ss less need for extra beta 2-agonist during night, than the salbutamol-treated group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

40例患有稳定型哮喘且每日需要吸入β2受体激动剂的患者被纳入一项随机双盲研究。他们接受了为期六周的吸入β2受体激动剂治疗,其中一组使用沙丁胺醇,每日4次,每次200微克;另一组使用福莫特罗,每日2次,每次12微克,另外2次为安慰剂。在此之前有一个导入期,所有患者均接受特布他林吸入治疗,每日4次,每次500微克。20例患者使用福莫特罗,18例使用沙丁胺醇。沙丁胺醇治疗组中有1例患者在三周后因哮喘病情恶化而停止治疗。患者在日记卡上记录用药前早晚的呼气峰值流速(PEFR)、哮喘症状评分(0 - 3级;0 = 无症状,3 = 严重症状)以及额外使用β2受体激动剂的剂量。在治疗0周、3周和6周后分别测量1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)和PEFR。研究结束时,由患者和医生对治疗进行盲法整体评估。在导入期两组患者存在差异。随后接受沙丁胺醇治疗的组,其早晨PEFR在统计学上显著更高,哮喘症状评分在统计学上显著低于夜间,且额外使用β2受体激动剂的需求在统计学上显著更少。在治疗期间,与导入期相比,福莫特罗治疗组早晨PEFR在统计学上显著升高。此外,该组夜间症状评分在统计学上显著少于另一组,且夜间额外使用β2受体激动剂的需求在统计学上显著少于沙丁胺醇治疗组。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验