Amthauer Hilarea, Gaglio Bridget, Glasgow Russell E, Dortch Wendy, King Diane K
Kaiser Permanente, Denver, Colorado (Mss Amthauer, Gaglio, and King, and Dr Glasgow)
Ms Amthauer is now with the Department of Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver.
Diabetes Educ. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4):673-81. doi: 10.1177/014572170302900413.
This study reports on methods and strategies employed to increase participation rates in diabetes interventions and discusses the reach and representativeness of the Diabetes Priority Program.
A passive mail-out procedure was used to contact patients of participating primary care physicians. Patients who did not return the refusal postcard were contacted. Several attempts were made to contact potential participants. Brochures, "wrong number" postcards, posters, and reports for clinic staff were strategies used to increase participation.
The recruitment process resulted in a participation rate of 83% among patients who were contacted and eligible. These participants appeared to be representative of both nonparticipants and persons with diabetes in Colorado. In contrast, a low percentage of primary care physicians, estimated at 3%, took part in the program despite efforts to make the program brief, nonintrusive, and compatible with usual care.
Recruitment is currently challenging and will become even more difficult with the privacy regulations that affect healthcare research and the public distrust of solicitations. To increase participation rates, it is important that the clinic staff promotes and supports the program, and that participant lists are accurate and adequate in size.
本研究报告了为提高糖尿病干预参与率所采用的方法和策略,并讨论了糖尿病优先项目的覆盖范围和代表性。
采用被动邮寄程序联系参与研究的初级保健医生的患者。未返还拒绝明信片的患者会被再次联系。多次尝试联系潜在参与者。宣传册、“打错电话”明信片、海报以及给诊所工作人员的报告是用于提高参与率的策略。
招募过程使被联系且符合条件的患者参与率达到了83%。这些参与者似乎代表了科罗拉多州的非参与者和糖尿病患者。相比之下,尽管努力使项目简洁、不干扰且与常规护理兼容,但估计只有3%的初级保健医生参与了该项目。
目前招募工作具有挑战性,随着影响医疗保健研究的隐私法规以及公众对招揽活动的不信任,招募将变得更加困难。为提高参与率,诊所工作人员宣传和支持该项目以及参与者名单准确且规模足够很重要。