• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无张力阴道吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价。

Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary stress incontinence.

作者信息

Cody J, Wyness L, Wallace S, Glazener C, Kilonzo M, Stearns S, McCormack K, Vale L, Grant A

机构信息

Health Services Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(21):iii, 1-189. doi: 10.3310/hta7210.

DOI:10.3310/hta7210
PMID:13678548
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in comparison with the standard surgical interventions currently used.

DATA SOURCES

Literature searches were carried out on electronic databases and websites for data covering the period 1966--2002. Other sources included references lists of relevant articles; selected experts in the field; abstracts of a limited number of conference proceedings titles; and the Internet.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review of studies including comparisons of TVT with any of the comparators was conducted. Alternative treatments considered were abdominal retropubic colposuspension (including both open and laparoscopic colposuspension), traditional suburethral sling procedures and injectable agents (periurethral bulking agents). The identified studies were critically appraised and their results summarised. A Markov model comparing TVT with the comparators was developed using the results of the review of effectiveness and data on resource use and costs from previously conducted studies. The Markov model was used to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life-years for up to 10 years following surgery and it incorporated a probabilistic analysis and also sensitivity analysis around key assumptions of the model.

RESULTS

Based on limited data from direct comparisons with TVT and from systematic reviews, laparoscopic colposuspension and traditional slings have broadly similar cure rates to TVT and open colposuspension, whereas injectable agents appear to have lower cure rates. TVT is less invasive than colposuspension and traditional sling procedures, and is also usually performed under regional or local anaesthesia. The principal operative complication is bladder perforation. There are currently no randomised controlled trial (RCT) data beyond 2 years post-surgery, and long-term effects are therefore currently not known reliably. TVT was more likely to be considered cost-effective compared with the other surgical procedures. Increasing the absolute probability of cure following TVT reduced the likelihood that TVT would be considered cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term performance of TVT in terms of both continence and unanticipated adverse effects is not known reliably at the moment. Despite relatively few robust comparative data, it appears that in the short to medium term TVT's effectiveness approaches that of alternative procedures currently available, and is of lower cost. As TVT is a less invasive procedure, it is possible that some women who would currently be managed non-surgically will be considered eligible for TVT. Increased adoption of TVT will require additional surgeons proficient in the technique. It is likely that some of the higher rates of complications, e.g. bladder perforation, reported for TVT are associated with a 'learning curve'. Appropriate training will therefore be needed for surgeons new to the operation, in respect of both the technical aspects of the procedure and the choice of women suitable for the operation. Further research suggestions include unbiased assessments of longer term performance from follow-up of controlled trials or population-based registries; more data from methodologically sound RCTs using standard outcome measures; a surveillance system to detect longer term complications, if any, associated with the use of tape; and rigorous evaluation before extending the use of TVT to women who are currently managed non-surgically.

摘要

目的

评估无张力阴道吊带术(TVT)与目前使用的标准外科手术干预措施相比的有效性和成本效益。

数据来源

在电子数据库和网站上进行文献检索,以获取1966年至2002年期间的数据。其他来源包括相关文章的参考文献列表;该领域的选定专家;有限数量会议论文标题的摘要;以及互联网。

综述方法

对包括TVT与任何对照措施比较的研究进行系统综述。考虑的替代治疗方法有耻骨后阴道膀胱颈悬吊术(包括开放和腹腔镜膀胱颈悬吊术)、传统尿道下吊带手术和注射剂(尿道周围填充剂)。对识别出的研究进行严格评估并总结其结果。利用有效性综述结果以及先前研究的资源使用和成本数据,建立了一个比较TVT与对照措施的马尔可夫模型。该马尔可夫模型用于估计手术后长达10年的成本和质量调整生命年,并纳入了概率分析以及围绕模型关键假设的敏感性分析。

结果

基于与TVT直接比较的有限数据以及系统综述,腹腔镜膀胱颈悬吊术和传统吊带术的治愈率与TVT和开放膀胱颈悬吊术大致相似,而注射剂的治愈率似乎较低。TVT的侵入性低于膀胱颈悬吊术和传统吊带手术,并且通常在区域或局部麻醉下进行。主要手术并发症是膀胱穿孔。目前尚无术后2年以上的随机对照试验(RCT)数据,因此目前无法可靠地了解长期效果。与其他外科手术相比,TVT更有可能被认为具有成本效益。提高TVT术后治愈的绝对概率会降低TVT被认为具有成本效益的可能性。

结论

目前尚无法可靠地了解TVT在尿失禁和意外不良反应方面的长期表现。尽管可靠的比较数据相对较少,但在短期至中期,TVT的有效性似乎接近目前可用的替代手术,且成本较低。由于TVT是一种侵入性较小的手术,一些目前接受非手术治疗的女性可能会被认为适合TVT。TVT的更多采用将需要更多精通该技术的外科医生。TVT报告的一些较高并发症发生率,例如膀胱穿孔,可能与“学习曲线”有关。因此,对于新开展该手术的外科医生,在手术技术方面以及适合手术的女性选择方面都需要进行适当培训。进一步的研究建议包括对对照试验或基于人群的登记随访的长期表现进行无偏评估;使用标准结局指标从方法学合理的RCT中获取更多数据;建立一个监测系统以检测与使用吊带相关的任何长期并发症;以及在将TVT的使用扩展到目前接受非手术治疗的女性之前进行严格评估。

相似文献

1
Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary stress incontinence.无张力阴道吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(21):iii, 1-189. doi: 10.3310/hta7210.
2
Suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的耻骨后尿道悬吊术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD001754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001754.
3
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的耻骨后膀胱颈悬吊术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20(3):CD002912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912.pub2.
6
Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的耻骨后开放式阴道悬吊术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD002912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912.
7
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
10
Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的腹腔镜阴道悬吊术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD002239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A levator ani midurethral support via single vaginal incision technique to treat stress urinary incontinence: A case report.经单一阴道切口技术行肛提肌中尿道悬吊术治疗压力性尿失禁:病例报告
Case Rep Womens Health. 2023 Jul 27;39:e00530. doi: 10.1016/j.crwh.2023.e00530. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.单切口微型吊带与标准合成中段尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:SIMS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(47):1-190. doi: 10.3310/BTSA6148.
3
Economic evaluation of surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: a cost-utility and value of information analysis.
女性压力性尿失禁手术治疗的经济学评价:成本-效用和信息价值分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 11;10(6):e035555. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035555.
4
Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.传统的女性尿失禁耻骨后尿道悬吊手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 28;1(1):CD001754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001754.pub5.
5
Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.腹腔镜阴道悬吊术治疗女性尿失禁
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 10;12(12):CD002239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub4.
6
Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.腹腔镜下女性尿失禁悬吊术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 27;7(7):CD002239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub3.
7
Informed consent checklists for midurethral slings: a common-sense approach.中段尿道吊带知情同意检查表:一种常识性方法。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1639-1643. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3456-7. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
8
Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.治疗女性尿失禁的传统尿道下吊带手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD001754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001754.pub4.
9
Transobturator tape versus retropubic tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence: 5-year safety and effectiveness outcomes following a randomised trial.经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术与耻骨后无张力尿道中段悬吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁:一项随机试验后的5年安全性和有效性结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):879-86. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2902-7. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
10
Outcomes of Midurethral Slings in Women with Concomitant Preoperative Severe Lower Urinary Tract Voiding Symptoms.伴有术前严重下尿路排尿症状的女性患者接受中段尿道吊带手术的疗效
Ochsner J. 2015 Fall;15(3):223-7.