Faisal-Cury Alexandre, Rossi Menezes Paulo, Kahhale Soubhi, Zugaib Marcelo
Department of Obstetrics, University of São Paulo, R. Dr. Mário Ferraz, 135/42, J. Europa, 01453-010 São Paulo, Brazil.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004 Dec;270(4):263-4. doi: 10.1007/s00404-003-0552-3. Epub 2003 Sep 12.
The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of surgical glove perforation among obstetric and gynecological surgical procedures, and to evaluate surgeons' perceptions.
A cross-sectional study was conducted in which nursing personnel examined the gloves used in obstetric and gynecological procedures, immediately after the surgery, in order to detect perforations.
Surgical glove perforation occurred in 20.8% of 817 obstetrics procedures and 24.4% of 131 gynecology procedures. The observed difference between groups was not statistically significant (p=0.35). Obstetricians perceived the occurrence of perforation in 30.6% of the events, and gynecologists in 37.5%. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.44).
本研究旨在比较妇产科手术中手术手套穿孔的频率，并评估外科医生的认知情况。
开展了一项横断面研究，护理人员在手术后立即检查妇产科手术中使用的手套，以检测是否有穿孔。
817例产科手术中有20.8%发生手术手套穿孔，131例妇科手术中有24.4%发生穿孔。两组之间观察到的差异无统计学意义（p = 0.35）。产科医生认为30.6%的事件中发生了穿孔，妇科医生认为37.5%的事件中发生了穿孔。这一差异无统计学意义（p = 0.44）。
