CASALS J
Bull World Health Organ. 1961;24(6):723-34.
Owing to the existence of antigenic groups and to the consequent characteristics of the immune response of a host to grouped viruses, certain logical steps are advisable in the process of identification of an arthropod-borne (arbor) virus. The first of these steps is the determination of the arthropod-borne nature of the virus. Since no antigenic property is known to be common to all arbor viruses, the decision is based on other biological properties and on the circumstances of isolation. The second step is determination of the antigenic group. For this are used hyperimmune sera with considerable cross-reactivity within the group, as well as the test that gives the most overlap. The third step is determination of type within the group. Simple immune sera and the least cross-reactive test are used at this step.Viruses that belong in minor groups or are ungrouped often constitute a big problem owing to the fact that, once the major groups have been eliminated from further consideration, comparative studies must be conducted with practically all the remaining viruses before a definitive answer is reached.
由于抗原组的存在以及宿主对分组病毒免疫反应的相应特性,在鉴定虫媒(虫传)病毒的过程中,采取某些合乎逻辑的步骤是可取的。这些步骤中的第一步是确定病毒的虫媒性质。由于尚无已知的所有虫传病毒共有的抗原特性,因此该决定基于其他生物学特性和分离情况。第二步是确定抗原组。为此使用在组内具有相当大交叉反应性的超免疫血清,以及给出最大重叠的试验。第三步是确定组内的型别。此步骤使用简单免疫血清和交叉反应性最小的试验。属于小群或未分组的病毒常常构成一个大问题,原因在于一旦将主要组排除在进一步考虑之外,在得出明确答案之前,必须对几乎所有剩余病毒进行比较研究。