Esteban J M, Sheibani K
Division of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Mod Pathol. 1992 Nov;5(6):626-30.
The distinction of malignant mesotheliomas from adenocarcinomas with pleural involvement is often difficult, even with electron microscopic and state-of-the-art histochemical and immunologic studies. We evaluated the DNA ploidy and cell cycle of 45 clinically, morphologically, and immunohistochemically well-characterized malignant mesotheliomas to establish their ploidy profile and compared it with that of 41 pulmonary adenocarcinomas. All the cases were mucin negative and had been immunophenotyped with the following monoclonal antibodies: anti-keratin, anti-CEA, anti-Vimentin, anti-HMFG2, Leu M1 (CD15) and B72.3. Single cell suspensions from the paraffin blocks were prepared following Hedley's technique and were analyzed with a Coulter EPICS V flow cytometer. The resulting histograms were interpreted with the Multicycle software program. Five cases were excluded due to their high coefficients of variation. DNA aneuploidy was defined by the presence of more than one G0/G1 peak on the histograms obtained exclusively from the tumor sample. With this criterion, there is a possibility of missing aneuploid cases with a single aneuploid cycling population; however, fixatives and time of fixation produce such a remarkable variation in the fluorochrome uptake that any control, other than normal tissue present in the sample, was rendered unreliable. Five (14%) cases were DNA aneuploid with DNA indexes ranging from 1.2 to 1.9 (mean = 1.5). Three cases had increased S + G2/M values. Of the aneuploid cases, four were epithelial and one sarcomatous. In comparison, aneuploidy was found in 31 (75%) of the lung adenocarcinomas studied (p < 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
即便采用电子显微镜以及最先进的组织化学和免疫学研究方法,区分恶性间皮瘤与累及胸膜的腺癌往往仍很困难。我们评估了45例临床、形态学及免疫组织化学特征明确的恶性间皮瘤的DNA倍性和细胞周期,以确定其倍性谱,并与41例肺腺癌进行比较。所有病例黏液均为阴性,并用以下单克隆抗体进行了免疫表型分析:抗角蛋白、抗癌胚抗原、抗波形蛋白、抗HMFG2、Leu M1(CD15)和B72.3。按照Hedley的技术从石蜡块制备单细胞悬液,并用库尔特EPICS V流式细胞仪进行分析。所得直方图用Multicycle软件程序进行解读。5例因变异系数高而被排除。DNA非整倍体由仅从肿瘤样本获得的直方图上出现一个以上G0/G1峰来定义。按照这个标准,有可能漏诊具有单个非整倍体循环群体的非整倍体病例;然而,固定剂和固定时间会使荧光染料摄取产生显著变化,以至于除样本中存在的正常组织外,任何对照都变得不可靠。5例(14%)为DNA非整倍体,DNA指数范围为1.2至1.9(平均 = 1.5)。3例S + G2/M值升高。在非整倍体病例中,4例为上皮型,1例为肉瘤型。相比之下,在所研究的肺腺癌中有31例(75%)发现非整倍体(p < 0.0001)。(摘要截短于250词)