Suppr超能文献

评估用于测量血清普鲁卡因胺和N-乙酰普鲁卡因胺浓度的超快速发射Qst方法。

Evaluation of very rapid emit Qst methods for measuring serum procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide concentrations.

作者信息

Carnes C A, Coyle J D

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 1992;12(1):40-4.

PMID:1372425
Abstract

This study assessed the Emit Qst procainamide (PA) and N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) assays. Accuracy and intraday precision were evaluated by repeatedly measuring PA and NAPA concentrations in spiked serum samples using Qst and high-performance liquid chromatography methods. Interday precision was evaluated by measuring concentrations in spiked samples over 4 weeks. Correlation between methods was assessed in patient samples, and proportional, constant, and random errors were estimated. Intraday coefficients of variation (CVs) were below 6.4% for PA and NAPA for both methods; interday CVs were below 7.8%. The proportional, constant, and random errors of the PA Qst assay in patient samples were 5.7%, -0.224 mg/L, and +/- 0.574 mg/L, respectively. The same errors in the NAPA Qst assay were 17.2%, 0.229 mg/L, and +/- 1.79 mg/L, respectively. The Qst assays are rapid, accurate, and precise methods for routine clinical measurement of PA and NAPA, although the proportional error in the NAPA assay should be recognized.

摘要

本研究评估了Emit Qst法检测普鲁卡因胺(PA)和N - 乙酰普鲁卡因胺(NAPA)的情况。通过使用Qst法和高效液相色谱法反复测量加标血清样本中的PA和NAPA浓度来评估准确性和日内精密度。通过在4周内测量加标样本中的浓度来评估日间精密度。在患者样本中评估两种方法之间的相关性,并估计比例误差、恒定误差和随机误差。两种方法中PA和NAPA的日内变异系数(CV)均低于6.4%;日间CV低于7.8%。患者样本中PA Qst法的比例误差、恒定误差和随机误差分别为5.7%、 - 0.224 mg/L和±0.574 mg/L。NAPA Qst法中的相同误差分别为17.2%、0.229 mg/L和±1.79 mg/L。Qst法是用于PA和NAPA常规临床检测的快速、准确且精密的方法,不过应认识到NAPA检测中的比例误差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验