Carnes C A, Coyle J D
College of Pharmacy, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.
Pharmacotherapy. 1992;12(1):40-4.
This study assessed the Emit Qst procainamide (PA) and N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) assays. Accuracy and intraday precision were evaluated by repeatedly measuring PA and NAPA concentrations in spiked serum samples using Qst and high-performance liquid chromatography methods. Interday precision was evaluated by measuring concentrations in spiked samples over 4 weeks. Correlation between methods was assessed in patient samples, and proportional, constant, and random errors were estimated. Intraday coefficients of variation (CVs) were below 6.4% for PA and NAPA for both methods; interday CVs were below 7.8%. The proportional, constant, and random errors of the PA Qst assay in patient samples were 5.7%, -0.224 mg/L, and +/- 0.574 mg/L, respectively. The same errors in the NAPA Qst assay were 17.2%, 0.229 mg/L, and +/- 1.79 mg/L, respectively. The Qst assays are rapid, accurate, and precise methods for routine clinical measurement of PA and NAPA, although the proportional error in the NAPA assay should be recognized.
本研究评估了Emit Qst法检测普鲁卡因胺(PA)和N - 乙酰普鲁卡因胺(NAPA)的情况。通过使用Qst法和高效液相色谱法反复测量加标血清样本中的PA和NAPA浓度来评估准确性和日内精密度。通过在4周内测量加标样本中的浓度来评估日间精密度。在患者样本中评估两种方法之间的相关性,并估计比例误差、恒定误差和随机误差。两种方法中PA和NAPA的日内变异系数(CV)均低于6.4%;日间CV低于7.8%。患者样本中PA Qst法的比例误差、恒定误差和随机误差分别为5.7%、 - 0.224 mg/L和±0.574 mg/L。NAPA Qst法中的相同误差分别为17.2%、0.229 mg/L和±1.79 mg/L。Qst法是用于PA和NAPA常规临床检测的快速、准确且精密的方法,不过应认识到NAPA检测中的比例误差。